search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Remarkable considering that the Décision built all-composite Maxi UBS Switzerland had already won the 1985/86 Whitbread Race, but when Windward Passage II appeared at the Kenwood Cup in 1988 she was the first ever inshore carbon Maxi. She soon made obsolete the rest of her aluminium rivals but would in turn herself be overwhelmed when Bill Koch built his ‘refined yet crude’ 90ft Maxi monster Matador2


a couple of years later. However, the far more elegant German Frers design is still the one that we’d hang on the office wall


supersede Sparkman & Stephens in another area too, one that brought consid- erable commercial value to his growing practice: that of in-house designer for Nautor’s Swan range of yachts. While Ron Holland, also at the top of the offshore racing world at the time, secured the smaller end of the prestigious Swan line-up, Frers replaced S&S in the 46ft-plus range. This was to set him up perfectly as the demand for ever larger racing and cruising yachts started to emerge in the mid-1980s. Beauty is of course highly subjective, but


I think it is fair to say that Germán Frers is generally regarded in the boating world as a creator of yachts where balance of line, pro- portions and overall aesthetics are second to none. This striving for and achieving beauty is nowhere better expressed than in the glorious 140ft superyacht Rebecca. Built in 1999, she was commissioned as a reproduc- tion classic, utilising styling symbols of a bygone era allied throughout with modern engineering. A perfect pallet for Frers to work his emotion-stirring aesthetic skills. And he did. Rebecca is, rightly, regarded


as one of the finest-proportioned yachts in existence. The story goes that such impor- tance was put on the combination of shear line and bow angle that not only were many drawn options considered, but sev- eral accurate scale models were also built to check out this all-important relationship. Interesting for the time, this did not favour the increasingly fashionable plumb bow. This affinity with beauty and a certain


commitment to the concept of a proper yacht did, however, make for a slight downside in those formative IOR days.


40 SEAHORSE


While Frers drew many good-looking small boats his only wins in the fierce level- rating Ton Cup classes occurred at the Two Ton level – the largest of the classes for boats around 44ft. The Frers IOR design philosophies simply


didn’t embrace the big dinghy approach which began in the Quarter Ton classes as far back as 1973 and then moved remorse- lessly through the Ton Cup classes and ulti- mately by 1981 had reached the premier big boat events like the Admiral’s Cup and Sardinia Cup. Frers characteristically drew several of the prettiest IOR One Tonners ever to compete in this class, especially during the super-hot decade 1982 to 1992, but they rarely reached the podium. Ironi- cally, though, Germán Frers was the first designer to make a commanding success of the big dinghy approach in the biggest IOR class of them all: the Maxi. In her first ever regatta – the 1988 Ken-


wood Cup in Hawaii – Rod Muir’s brand new Windward Passage II convincingly beat all the other established Maxi cham- pions. The new Passage was relatively beamy, light and wide sterned. She was also fractionally rigged, a design concept successfully brought to the masthead-dom- inated IOR Maxi class by Frers with the previous championship-winning Il Moro. It is probably fair to say that the success


of these two great Frers Maxis finally signalled the death of the masthead rig for IOR racing right across the size ranges. The third generation of the Frers family


yacht design business is headed up by Mani Frers III, who helped set up a second Frers design office in Milan originally to


service the mighty Il Moro di Venezia America’s Cup campaign of 1992. This was an absolutely massive campaign by the Italians to win the America’s Cup – now held in the new IACC class. The father and son team were given the oppor- tunity to develop an America’s Cup chal- lenger to a brand new, untested rule, with a five-boat development programme. Sadly, like every other challenger for the


Auld Mug that year, they embarked down the wrong design path. With a dose of further irony, the beamy, dinghy-like shape that appeared to be favoured by the new rule was, in fact, a blind alley. The Frers-designed Il Moro boats did


prove to be the fastest of the challengers by winning the Louis Vuitton Cup but in the America’s Cup itself they came up against a certain Doug Peterson-inspired Defender that by comparison was extraordinarily narrow of beam. This very different design path was to prove conclusive and became the dominant shape of this era of America’s Cup yachts. Ironically the Frers family would later join forces with Doug Peterson to design the Prada America’s Cup boats for the 2000 challenge, again making it through to the Cup Match before falling to Team New Zealand. Mani Frers then went on to use this


experience to be the sole designer for the Swedish Victory team of 2003 and 2007. But ultimately the America’s Cup remained a yachting trophy where Frers (along, to be fair, with most of the other modern design greats) would fail to emulate the success of Sparkman & Stephens. However, Germán Frers was very much





BARRY PICKTHALL/PPL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122