Former Team New Zealand and later Land Rover BAR technical director Andy Claughton looks at what we know so far and what we should – and should not – expect during the run-up to America’s Cup 36 in 2021
The bare facts
Class yachts (AC75s) under the restrictions of the Protocol. Getting afloat is a big step forward. For
During this July Ineos Team UK launched their test boat, the first physical evidence that preparations for the 36th America’s Cup are underway. The latest Cup Protocol permits teams to do on-the-water testing in any yacht that is less than 12m long. Other than this all sailing must be done in the AC
46 SEAHORSE
all the talk about computer simulation and 3D CAD modelling there is nothing like working with some hardware to find the problems, nothing like having something that floats to get the sailors engaged with how they will sail the boat. The British test boat has taken several months to adapt from its previous life as a lake racer. It now has the full America’s Cup foil package and control system. This pocket rocket certainly works and
has been charging up and down the Solent at 30kt+ by all accounts. At this size of boat and given it’s a prototype the proportions are somewhat different from the Cup Class itself. The current foils are larger to make
sure the thing takes off easily. On the Cup boats different foils are available for differ- ent wind strengths but it’s unlikely the prototype will have too many of those. Having seen the boat sailing everyone –
not just Ineos UK – can press on more confidently towards the full-sized boats. The basic concept works; quite how all this will unfold getting out of a dial-up or in a tacking duel who knows, but there isn’t much the top sailors can’t work out. Despite its modest size there is plenty
going on inside this little boat: full race wiring loom and probably some controls that control ride height; initially there is a powered version of the Moth foil control wand. This will be illegal on the Cup boats, but at this stage using an autopilot system is essential in terms of learning control
INGRID ABERY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100