search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The last time the Admiral’s Cup was run under IOR was in 1993 when Germany took its third victory in the history of the series, this time winning by just 0.25pt from runners-up Italy. The T-bone of Dutch 50-footer Promotion by Italy’s own 50 Mandrake was not the only major drama in the series; as IOR yachts hit maximum build-refinement they also reached maximum fragility. Harold Cudmore’s One Tonner Jameson sank in the first inshore race after tapping Christchurch Ledge just hard enough to remove the entire keel, while the rest of the One Tonners each had their own ‘moments’ with a top mark laid a little too close to the beach… In IOR’s final days it was thus no great surprise when the editor onboard the Japanese entry Nippon watched the bottom half of the keel of the UK One Tonner float past him. All wood, you see…


One may of course argue that the bigger boats do this anyway, and so in this case the 45-53 footers. But clearly, if aiming for a good number of teams (personally I would be disappointed to see fewer than 15 teams representing at least 10 countries), it takes some spread of boat sizes to achieve this.


I support the spread presented, around 40 and 50ft – no wild adventures so guaranteeing ample candidates. Also, ‘too much spread can kill you’, boats racing in completely different conditions and the fast ones spending more time waiting for the slow ones than actually racing.


I guess we will see a majority of the fleet zooming in on maximum LH (hull length) in either class? Potentially being the fastest boat is often seen as a good thing, but with about half the points being scored in offshore races it might not pan out this way. Still, given the choice I guess nearly two-thirds of both classes will end up at max LH. Which in itself can be good reason to go in the opposite direction, small can be beautiful.


Say the NoR is released this summer, will we see new builds in 2024-25, designed specifically for the 2025 Admiral’s Cup? I guess we will, but it won’t be easy to get those designs right as it is a very long time since mixed race format events were popular at the highest level.


If anything we saw the opposite trend over the past decades, so boats only racing inshore races or even more specific windward- leeward races and other boats optimised to go offshore. And it is not that the Solent and Channel conditions are easy to predict. Sure there will be some reaching…


Possibly it could be good to restrict boat eligibility to monohull boats with fixed appendages, so not allow canting keels and certainly not (semi) flying boats? And ban powered winches, rams etc? Not that I do not like these developments but to get the fairest racing it is wise to box boats and equipment in a bit, so the teams ‘box with gloves of similar weight’?


Berth the boats together in Cowes, get fully sorted on equipment checks before and during the event. Do not allow crew changes other than for good reason, which of course would not be that it is going to be a light or a windy day. Weigh the crew once, three days or so before the first race, and then let them run free. Also reduce the IRC crew weight limit by 5kg for each crew who is not a female nor under 27… Or something similar to promote diversity. And by 25kg if the genuine owner is not on the boat. Finally, presuming teams will represent their country and given the teams are two boats only, I would not be against allowing three teams to enter per country and maybe set the overall limit for the UK at five, instead of allowing boats to enter for Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and England; also a disincentive for others to come up with similar ‘constructions’ or sailing under flags they have no relation with.


The alternative of course being club teams but that would take out some ‘promotional spice’. Possibly it is wise to set a maximum number of boats that can enter, such as 50, to have starts that are manageable. Sixteen countries would then at max produce 50 boats, taking up their full quota.


Both would be a miracle of course. Give the number of countries priority over the number of teams per country – I do not expect more than 16 countries and certainly not that each then uses up its full quota of teams. But who would want to miss this party?!?! No panic, the NoR is an invitation to join that can be amended. Keep us informed, RORC!


Rob Weiland, TP52 class manager  SEAHORSE 39 Visuel_Swivel locks_Seahorse_90_270.indd 1 08/02/2023 09:34:22





SWIVEL LOCKS


Reliability & Performance


Class 40 - Ocean 50 - Imoca 60 & fast cruising boats


6T 4T 8T


With quiet confi dence, our swivel locks, fl ying sail furlers and structural furlers have proven their RELIABILITYand PERFORMANCE.


New swivel locks models: 2.5T and 12T


profurl.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121