Main picture: the Bristol pilot cutter influence continues to make itself felt in some of the best-looking of the latest superyachts – a little display of yachting heritage can play well in the right context. Above clockwise from top left: 3D model of the hull door system – cutting an aperture of this size, particularly of this vertical depth in a long and relatively flat composite structure, is not something to undertake lightly. 75 per cent of the local freeboard is penetrated in the key bending area between the mast foot and forestay; the very considerable reinforcement and mechanics of the balcony/door to the owner’s cabin are well concealed; not a bad place to take your breakfast; door opening mechanism. This global FEA model (left) gives an insight into both global and local laminate behaviour
and challenges and with the mechanical systems now becoming an integral part of the structure, Gurit not only took respon- sibility for the composite design but also, with the Baltic Yachts team, the concept and preliminary design of the door mecha- nism itself, with Baltic Yachts’ in-house mechanical engineering team turning Gurit’s mechanism design into final fabri- cation drawings. The feasibility of a number of different concepts was investigated while keeping in
mind these primary considerations: l Firstly, the clearance between the top of the doorframe and the underside of the deck was very small, as little as 200mm, so space for mechanical devices in this area was very restricted. l Secondly, the number of devices should be minimised to limit complexity, weight and risk of mechanical failure. A solution was found that incorporated
structural hydraulically actuated hinges at the bottom corners, capable of transferring
axial and shear forces between the hull and the door, and transversely mounted hydraulically actuated pins in the upper corners which project into tight-fitting receptacles within the door. These four components have the effect of holding the four corners of the door and transferring the in-plane global loads in a way compar - able to a diagonal truss, while minimising the number of moving parts. Additional side-locking pins were incorporated into the sides of the door for watertightness but
SEAHORSE 53
w
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94