search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Striking a balance IRC


As a cornerstone of competitive sailing around the world, IRC strives to create a fair and competitive environment for a diverse fleet of boats to race together. Every year the IRC Technical Committee and IRC Congress debate and decide on rule changes aimed at improving the fairness of IRC racing. Sails are a boat’s driving force and a key area of development, so it’s no surprise how often an IRC rule change involves the rating of sails or associated rigging. So a key change for 2024 is that for the first time the number of headsails will be rated (from 1 June in the southern hemisphere). Let’s look at why IRC’s rating of headsail numbers carried is


not only a logical step from a performance perspective but also a sustainable one for the sport. Recent years have seen a rise in the number of increasingly


specialist headsails being added to onboard inventories, bringing a plethora of initials such as JT, SS, GS, MH0 and FR0. Offshore racers are often seen sporting double, triple or occasionally


The maximum number of headsails before each boat’s rating is bumped up depends upon more than just the size of the boat; the IRC Technical Committee published a notice in autumn 2023 with approximate rating effects for some example designs. So far this year we see most boats declaring headsails close to


the ‘no rating change’ number, though there are variations within designs reflecting different choices and configurations. For example, the headsail declarations for some popular designs are: J/109 1-3 headsails; First 40 2-3; JPK 10.80 2-5; Ker 40 3-4; Sun Fast 3300 1-4; TP52 4-5; X-41 2-5. Boats that comply as IRC One Designs are rated for the maximum number of headsails allowed by their class rules. All rating rules have the same aim of rating diverse boat types


as fairly as possible. But the responsibility for influencing design, technology development and even social behaviours cannot be ignored. The decision to rate the number of headsails was made not only to reflect performance benefits but to consider how IRC can promote longterm sustainable practices within our sport, such as careful consideration of manufacturing quantities and resource consumption as well as reduced disposal. According to sail recycling company Sustainable Sailing, global


production of sails is now upwards of 2,000 tonnes per year; as well as the environmental impacts of the production of modern materials there is the issue that around 99 per cent of those sails will end their lives in landfill. There are various options for owners when their sails reach end-of-life including recutting/reselling, upcycling into other items, and recycling; and many owners already consider these resources when their sails are replaced. Rating the number of headsails in IRC should also encourage


owners and sail designers to focus on optimising the performance of a limited number of headsails but with wider performance bands, which can ultimately drive forward development in sail design and technology and steadily reduce the number of sails produced and discarded each year.


The triple-headed rig first came to prominence in the 2017 Volvo Ocean Race – the second held in VO65 one-designs. To make the most of this rig good trimming is a prerequisite; one reason – the other being cost – why the set-up soon found an IRC audience among big budget campaigns where the financial outlay on sails and pro crew to trim them was less material. So for IRC to adhere to its basic principles of fairness something did need to be done


quadruple-header configurations today… and with no rating penalty. At the other end of the scale are the club racers with just one or two headsails in their entire inventory. While IRC 2024 doesn’t count how many headsails are set


simultaneously, there is now a rating price placed on the number of headsails carried. The more specialist sails carried the greater the ability to increase sail area by setting multiple headsails, par- ticularly for larger boats set up in a reaching configuration offshore. Introducing this new rating input aims to help ensure that race


outcomes continue to be determined as much as is practical by skill and strategy, rather than by a costly overabundance of sails. IRC Rule 21.7.1 – requiring that boats shall not carry onboard


more headsails than declared – follows the same model as for spinnakers and flying headsails. The important exception is for Special Regs-compliant safety


sails: one heavy-weather jib and one storm jib are exempt from the new headsail count (here it is worth noting that OSR sails are not just defined by size alone, there are additional OSR technical require- ments). Boats previously rated with a single furling headsail plus heavy-weather jib may now carry an OSR heavy-weather jib without declaration and therefore it will not be rated. While some may consider the new rule stringent, it aims to


increase fairness and the rating formulation takes into account various factors including boat size. For instance, classic boats often carry more headsails, and the rating formulation considers this.


38 SEAHORSE


Sticky In a move towards greater transparency IRC has introduced a new requirement for sail measurement stickers or stamps on all sails certified after 2023; currently this only applies to boats holding an Endorsed IRC certificate. This significant rule change works alongside increasing equipment


inspection at IRC events and is introduced in response to requests from event organisers and measurers. A measurement stamp on a sail serves as visual confirmation that a sail is properly measured, making it easier for event organisers, measurers and sailors to quickly verify that a boat’s sails comply with its rating certificate. Another primary goal is for sails to carry standardised information in a recognised format to reduce ambiguity. Of course, the question we receive is: does the rule apply to


every sail, or only the largest? Although IRC only requests the largest sizes for calculating a rating the sail sticker requirement does apply to every sail used on the boat. The reasoning is that every sail, even if designed to be smaller, needs to be certified (measured) to confirm its size, and the new rule reflects the importance of data accuracy across all sail sizes. On smaller jibs measurements may also be made to check whether the size complies as an OSR heavy-weather or storm jib. This new sail measurement sticker does not replace existing


numbered certification stickers from IRC-approved authorities such as World Sailing In-House Certification (IHC); measurement stickers complement these by displaying the measured data. By introducing sail measurement stickers IRC is committing to


increasing accountability in our sport by establishing a clear frame- work for easy verification. There are other new resources relating to sails on ircrating.org


in the Measurement section, including FAQs on headsail numbers and sail stickers. I encourage you to take a look at these… Jenny Howells, Technical Manager, RORC Rating Office


q


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110