search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
  


 a (Sail 062)


  GENNAKERS, CODES ZERO, ASYMMETRIC SPINNAKERS & STAY


Southampton Boat Show (Eurospars - J243) Cannes Yachting festival


YSAILS


Left: wet ride home on Offshore Team Germany’s Owen Clarke Imoca Einstein (the former Acciona) which was racing in the IRC fleet; the Fastnet Imoca division was for two-handed crews only but Team Germany is targeting the 2021-2022 Ocean Race and the Fastnet was a first trial of racing one of these short-handed designs with a full (five-person) crew. Her elapsed time would have put her mid-fleet in the Imoca division. So far so cramped. Above: classic ocean racing as the Manuard Class40 Eärendil – third in the 2019 Fastnet – starts the beat home (soon a reach) having rounded the Rock at sunrise. The top four Class40s were covered by less than two hours. You can almost feel the damp…


In hindsight not a bad idea to participate in a 600-mile offshore with a boat designed for offshore racing. For the Imoca sailors it is foremost testing and training but once you are racing you might as well push for a classic win. Incorporating the Imoca boats in the Ocean Race is increasingly looking like a good move too, for both institutions, but a lifesaver for The Race. Rather obvious, at least to me, but still a long road to go before we will see the real optimum dual-purpose concept.


With more and more offshore-oriented designs and design evolution turning up in corrected time racing we see rating systems trying to adapt to this, changing the rating as well as the sailing landscape with their choices.


The marketeers of the ‘scientific’ VPP rating systems already claim that their system will cope with this task and see no problem to fairly rate the ever-growing variety in development coming their way. However, history tells us they struggle – and so far have not coped any better (nor worse for that matter), when compared with single multiplier ‘semi-scientific systems’ with the much easier task of fairly rating boats that just differ marginally in hull design, weight and sail area.


Of course everybody is entitled to their own dream and I admire the effort going into optimising rating systems. I even recognise progress has been made. Just be very careful where you lay the pain as the existing fleet is vulnerable.


Inshore and certainly windward-leeward racing, no matter how refined the boat, will always struggle to find the same powerful emotional motivations. Here you will continue to find it harder to attract new participation interest and certainly much harder to find the required audience to attract sponsor interest. Current attempts to promote windward-leeward racing are mostly based on making the yacht owner part of an exclusive family. Exclu- sivity and large numbers of competitors at first sight bite each other but of course there are examples of the opposite. If everybody wear- ing a Rolex owned a racing yacht we would need more marina space. Still inshore racing needs a (bigger) dream. This can be sought partially in ‘more rewarding’ trophies, like trophies attached to national honour. But if we think back all the high-reward trophies we had in the 1970s and 80s, bar the America’s Cup, were based on a mix of inshore and offshore racing and the introduction of the wind- ward-leeward element is often seen as part cause of their downfall. Am I stating the obvious?


Rob Weiland, TP52 and Maxi72 class manager  SEAHORSE 33 30 years of race*


exper ience in Top-Down & Code Zero fur l ing


Special De Cable Less New!


signed Thimble


>


RATCHET FacnorPatent LIGHT


EASY CONNECTION


EASY FURLING NG


KURT ARRIGO/ROLEX


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104