search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
correctly set up but it does not inherently aid in the design process. Structural layouts must first be conceptualised based on experience and fast preliminary calculations, such as hand-calcs. Only after defining the yacht’s scantlings, structural layout, and panel arrangement can FEA validate the assumptions and refine the design.


How does FEA work? FEM breaks down large, complex problems – such as verifying the structural layout of a yacht – into smaller, more manageable calculations. This is achieved by dividing the geometry into a computational mesh. The process segments the yacht into numerous small elements (finite elements), making it easier to calculate deformations under applied loads. In essence, this methodology enables


precise analysis of structural response to loads and constraints in any part of the yacht, providing data on stress, strain, natural vibration frequencies, and other key material properties. This allows designers to refine and optimise structural components to achieve the required strength and stiffness.


At AMS, this methodology is seamlessly


integrated into our design workflow, ensuring structural efficiency and safety before production even begins.


The AMS workflow: how FEA- based design is structured At AMS, we verify all the yachts we design using FEA. Our typical workflow follows this structured process:


Preliminary Structural Sizing We begin with an initial structural definition, determining the hull structure’s geometry based on regulations, shipyard requirements, and our experience. This phase relies on hand-calcs and expertise. If executed correctly, the subsequent FEA validation will be swift. Otherwise, adjustments to the FE model’s mesh will be required – an extremely time- consuming task


Issuing Hull Lamination Drawings At this stage, the lamination drawings for the hull are usually issued (excluding localised reinforcements, which are added later), allowing the shipyard to begin work in advance, since the FEA results will primarily influence the internal


structures and deck, leaving the hull mostly unchanged except for some local reinforcements.


3D Modelling and FE Model Development Once the hull and deck structures are modelled in 3D, we develop the FE model for the entire yacht. A typical FE model consists of around 500,000 nodes and 400,000 elements, ensuring that every area, reinforcement, and detail is accurately represented.


FEA Validation and Refinement This preliminary structural sizing is then validated and refined using FEA to optimise structural efficiency. The yacht is analysed as initially designed.


•If adjustments are needed, material properties can be tuned within the


heights—mesh modifications are necessary, significantly increasing workload and time.


•If everything is correctly dimensioned, the engineering phase is completed,


and we move on to detailed drawings


•If geometrical modifications are required—such as adjusting structural


FE model (a relatively quick process) �


First the hull and deck structures are modelled in 3D, then an FEA model is developed for the entire yacht SEAHORSE 67


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112