Consortium boosts offsite school construction

Employing modern methods of construction in the education sector has potentially taken a major step forward with the launch of a standardised structural frame and open source design app for building primary schools offsite An innovative approach to the way primary schools are designed, procured and built has been unveiled by the Seismic Consortium, a group created by construction consultants Blacc, the Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC), technology-led design practice Bryden Wood and two leading offsite manufacturers, Elliott and the McAvoy Group. Funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) through the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund and Innovate UK, and encouraged by the Department for Education, which has given the green- light to a wave of offsite schools, the consortium has collaborated closely in carrying out extensive research and development into the increased use of standardisation to drive down costs, reduce lead times and radically improve productivity in the delivery of primary schools. Seismic also believes that the framing system has the potential to reduce carbon emissions for a typical 40- module school by 25 per cent. Launched alongside the standardised system is an open source app for the design of primary schools which Seismic says will allow “the full spectrum of

community to get involved in the design of primary schools”.

The aim of the app is to enable architects, planners and manufacturers to work with teaching professionals, school governors, parents and pupils to configure a primary school building that will precisely meet their user needs on a specific site in full compliance with Department for Education and all regulatory requirements. Seismic believes the tool will significantly reduce the time and cost of the initial feasibility and design phases from weeks to minutes and will “democratise” the input of stakeholders by including them in the process.

Sam Stacey, Challenge Director – Transforming Construction at UKRI, commented: “The Seismic project is a powerful example that the targets set out in the Construction 2025 Strategy are achievable.

“The focus of Seismic was to realise the Government’s ambition for greater productivity in construction and this has definitely been achieved with the offsite and digital solutions developed by the team. We are in no doubt that these innovations have the potential to change the way primary school projects are designed, procured and constructed, helping to meet the rising demand for school places and increase capacity in the construction industry.”

Seismic says its universal connection

solution and a standardised structural frame for school buildings built offsite significantly reduces components and removes the need for welded joints, reducing labour costs and improving efficiency in a production environment. Research carried out by the consortium has demonstrated that by rationalising the design of the steel structure, the amount of steel used in an average primary school built offsite can be reduced by 25 per cent. This generates a cost saving of up to 25 per cent for the modular steel structure and carbon emissions for a typical 40-module school are 25 per cent lower.

Seismic is now finalising testing for the new framing solution and is collaborating with steel fabricators to develop the standardised components and establish a supply chain with a view to making these available to the offsite market in the coming months. This will aggregate demand and allow significant economies of scale to drive down costs.

The consortium has aspirations to apply the same manufacturing principles to “componentise” other parts of a building to be able to offer a whole school solution, including walls and roofs. It also aims to develop a “product family” for different types of buildings, such as housing and healthcare, saying this should act as a catalyst for “revolutionising the wider construction industry”. 7

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47