31
environment where students can reset and de-escalate. If it’s positioned directly alongside a hall or another high-occupancy area, noise and activity from those spaces can undermine the intention of the space. The same consideration applies to
larger communal areas. Dining halls and assembly spaces will inevitably generate more noise because of the number of people using them. Where possible, their relationship with teaching areas and quieter spaces should be considered as part of the overall layout. Natural light supports activities such as reading and writing, but simply maximising natural light shouldn’t necessarily be the objective. Light levels need to respond to the room pupils will be sitting and where glare as natural light changes throughout the day, but its intensity and character also need careful consideration. Ultimately, lighting design isn’t just a question of quantity; its quality and distribution are important as well. Schools are often full of colour, and the
assumption of creating soothing colour palettes may be to opt for blues and pastels, as we typically think of these as being calming colours. But saturated colours, especially across large areas like walls, can be visually demanding. Softer, more neutral or creamier tones can therefore reduce visual distraction and create a more comfortable backdrop for learning. With so many things to consider,
conversation from the outset. Almost every school building will outlive the brief that informed its original design. Cohorts, educational requirements and individual needs change, so designing limitations further down the line. Modern methods of construction
offer greater scope for this kind of layouts, adjustable partitioning and provision for future extensions. This is particularly relevant to SEND provision, where there’s no single set of requirements that will work for everyone. It also means moving away from the idea that inclusive design is
WJ232
synonymous with specialist provision. Some of the most effective interventions are relatively unobtrusive. As building designers, we have a
duty to recognise that an interior has a sensory dimension as well as an aesthetic one. A space that looks successful on paper can still place demands on the people using it if their needs have been overlooked during the design process. The question, then, isn’t how the education system can environment, it’s whether the standard environment was the right starting point. The opportunity is to move beyond a
traditional idea of what a school building should look like and create spaces that respond to the full range of students and staff who use them. Our structures should support wellbeing and learning without asking pupils to adapt to the building around them
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
