Feature: Sensors
Active electronically scanned arrays
(AESAs) are moving toward highly parallel implementations in which beamforming, signal conditioning and control functions sit close to the antenna aperture
also includes timing alignment, phase stability, channel-to-channel skew and sensitivity to temperature, supply variation and electromagnetic interference (EMI). Small phase or gain mismatches appear as beam-pointing error and sidelobe elevation, reducing detection and tracking margin. T ese directly infl uence beamforming accuracy and tracking stability. In multi-device FPGA-based
implementations, maintaining reliable latency across clock domains can require more careful synchronisation, constraints and verifi cation. Interconnect and clock distribution add propagation delay and skew, and the clock path can accumulate jitter. T ese eff ects are diffi cult to fully capture
in simulation at system scale. However, in hardware they appear as phase error and driſt . In turn, even small timing skew across channels translates into RF phase misalignment, degrading overall system coherence and, if that error varies with temperature or duty cycle, it can become a limiting factor rather than something calibration can fully remove. Integration can enable on-chip loopback, background phase and gain trimming, and digital compensation of analogue driſt over temperature and lifetime.
Where FPGA-centric architectures become harder to scale FPGAs remain valuable for moderate channel counts due to their fl exibility. However, as channel density and bandwidth increase, system-level integration challenges typically increase. T e primary constraint is oſt en not
processing capability but distribution. Modern radar ICs are mixed-signal, combining RF and analogue front ends with digital control, calibration state machines
www.electronicsworld.co.uk June 2026 25
and, in some cases, embedded processing. FPGA-based systems oſt en rely on external devices to implement complete signal chains, including converters, memory and driver stages. T is makes system performance more sensitive to interface, clocking and interconnect design, as well as the processing itself. While FPGA based systems can oſt en
meet radar requirements, as arrays scale the burden shiſt s to system level integration: reliable timing, coherence, interfaces, EMI, thermal management, testability and qualifi cation. ASIC integration can reduce device boundaries, allowing those properties to be engineered with greater control and reproducibility at high channel counts.
The gate-driver stage as a system boundary T e gate-driver stage illustrates these limitations clearly. In conventional implementations, control originates in digital logic, which may be FPGA-based, and then traverses I/O routing and isolation before reaching the gate-driver stage and the FET gate. An ASIC-based approach consolidates
this boundary; see Figure 1. A single device can provide a defi ned digital interface, integrated control logic and multiple output drivers matched to the FET characteristics. T is means that channel-to-channel timing alignment, drive strength and switching behaviour can be controlled within a single architecture. T e electrical environment at this stage
is demanding. T e driver operates close to large switching currents and high dV/dt transitions, where poor isolation or mismatched behaviour can couple noise back into the control path. Maintaining consistency across many channels with discrete components becomes increasingly diffi cult as array size grows. Defence radar systems operate in dynamic
Figure 1: ASIC chip layout for a 16-channel gate driver
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
