search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature: Wireless Technology


The potential and challenges of adopting the Q/V-band for communications


By Tudor Williams, Chief Technology Officer, Filtronic O


our world revolves around communication, expecting methods to be instant and reliable, regardless of the location. For this we


need RF technologies. We are increasingly seeing a new


player entering the sector, and that is the Q/V band, consisting of the Q-band and the V-band, covering frequencies from 47 to 52GHz. This combined band promises to more than double the bandwidth of current satellite systems, and faster, more-reliable communication for non-terrestrial and Earth-based networks alike. However, there are some technical challenges to address first, before this band’s full adoption can take place.


Ka vs Q/V The Ka-band, covering the spectrum between 26.5GHz and 40GHz, has been enormously important in satellite communications, but the Q and V bands


are now in the pipeline to be harnessed for next-generation networks. Together they offer a much wider spectrum, which means the new band can deliver faster data speeds to more users, with more efficient communication between satellites and ground stations. This makes it particularly attractive for industries like satellite communications and Earth observation, where there is growing need for faster, more reliable data transfer. However, switching to the Q/V band


isn’t a simple task. There are some technical hurdles to surmount first, one of them being the use of Travelling Wave Tube Amplifiers (TWTAs), which to date have been the well-established, go-to solution. Although these devices provide high power amplification, they are expensive, complex to manufacture and have limited lifetime.


Solid-state technology Solid State Power Amplifiers, or SSPAs, are a good alternative to TWTAs,


08 July/August 2025 www.electronicsworld.co.uk


particularly those SSPAs that are built with Gallium Nitride (GaN). This type offer similar performance to TWTAs but are smaller, simpler to make, more cost-effective and have a longer lifetime, often extending beyond 15 years. In satellite communications, size,


weight and power of components are always sensitive parameters, and especially for satellites used in military or deep-space missions, there are strict volume and weight limits. Overall, the lower costs and simpler and faster production make SSPAs highly suitable for cheaper and more scaleable satellite systems. This makes solid- state amplifiers a powerful solution, which is exactly what’s needed for high-frequency systems like those for the Q/V band. And, as semiconductor nodes continue to shrink — from 0.15 microns to even smaller process nodes of under 100nm — these devices will only become better performing and cheaper.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44