CONDITION MONITORING
UNPLANNED DOWNTIME COSTS UK MANUFACTURERS UP TO £736M EVERY WEEK
F
literally bring a business to its knees,” says Stefan Li, overseas market director of HIKMICRO. “Automotive production relies on pneumatic systems, compressed air and robotics, where even minor leaks can disrupt production and inflate energy costs, while in power-intensive facility inspection it’s all about identifying temperature measurement targets in specific scenarios and determining if anomalies exist. As a predictive maintenance duo they have no equal, so combining the AI56L for the former and SuperScene+ for the latter has never made more sense or been more timely.
“Intuitive and inclusive, they optimize detection like never before and also bridge the gap between complexity and simplicity, turning technologically advanced diagnostics into actionable insights for first time users and seasoned professionals alike.”
HIKMICRO
www.hikmicrotech.com
luke has released survey findings that expose the true cost of downtime in industrial manufacturing. The research reveals a silent crisis: nearly seven in ten (68 per cent) UK manufacturers suffered unplanned downtime in the past year, costing the sector up to £736 million every week, capital the industry cannot afford to lose. Downtime is not only frequent and prolonged, but also reflects vulnerabilities that threaten profitability, competitiveness, and board-level resilience.
Nearly half (46 per cent) report 6–10 downtime incidents weekly, while 15 per cent face 11–20 incidents weekly.
45 per cent say outages last up to 12 hours; 17 per cent report incidents stretching to 72 hours.
At an average cost of £1.36M per hour, a single incident can equal up to £49M in losses: the equivalent of powering 3,900 factories for a week.
The research, conducted by Censuswide, surveyed over 600 senior decision-makers and maintenance professionals in the U.S., the UK, and Germany. Among those affected, frequency is alarming: combined results show that 48 per cent report 6–10 incidents each week, and nearly one in five (19 per cent) face 11–20 weekly incidents. The impact is then compounded by duration, with 45 per cent of respondents saying outages last up to 12 hours, while a further 15 per cent experience incidents up to 72 hours. While these numbers are fairly consistent across the three regions, there is a staggering difference in the cost implications. At an average of £1.36M per hour, the cost of a single incident in both the UK and Germany can reach up to £49M in losses, compared to the global average of £1.27M per hour and £31.9M per incident.
These findings indicate that downtime is a globally recurring operational reality and a board-level risk to profitability and resilience – yet they also highlight a crisis that is costing UK manufacturers far more than their U.S. counterparts, underscoring a critical gap in Europe’s resilience. On a global level, the risks are more acute within large enterprises, as amongst organisations with more than 50,000 employees, 40 per cent report experiencing 11–20 downtime incidents each week, and half (50 per cent) endure up to 72 hours per incident. This highlights an urgent need to accelerate strategies that reduce downtime and strengthen operational continuity. Despite the scale of the risk, however, the industry remains fragmented in its response. The findings show that UK manufacturers are scattering digital investments across multiple solutions to build resilience, including predictive maintenance (12 per cent), digital twins (12 per cent), and condition monitoring (13 per cent). Parker Burke, group president, comments: “Our research paints a sobering picture: manufacturers are caught in a cycle where downtime eats directly into competitiveness, and too many are stuck with fragmented fixes. “The data makes clear that the frequency, duration, and cost of downtime expose systemic vulnerabilities in maintenance and reliability strategies. What once was viewed as an operational inconvenience has become a risk to enterprise value. Without a clear path to scale digital investments, manufacturers’ efforts risk being spread too thin to deliver meaningful resilience or return.”
He concludes: “The findings underscore the urgent need for manufacturers to rethink reliability not as a maintenance issue, but as a boardroom priority critical to growth, competitiveness, and customer trust.”
Fluke
www.fluke.com INDUSTRIAL COMPLIANCE |AUTUMN 2025 27
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
