Smoke ventilation systems
www.heatingandventilating.net
Natural vs mechanical ventilation
There are very few things more crucial for a functioning building than a working fire safety system. Not only is it a legal requirement, it can also be the determining factor protecting lives. Smoke ventilation is an integral part of these efforts, allowing the isolation of toxic gases and the safe removal of evacuees. Fire safety expert Sertus offers the following insight
S
moke ventilation systems can be divided into natural and mechanical. Choosing the right method is essential and makes a huge impact
when it comes to the effectiveness, suitability and energy efficiency of a building. So, what is the difference between the two? And when should you use each one? Natural smoke ventilation Natural smoke ventilation utilises the intrinsic qualities of the smoke itself to get rid of it. Smoke is naturally buoyant, so with some cleverly placed apertures, this can be leveraged to remove it from the building. These apertures, or vents, will open at the right time to release the gases, and close to contain them within certain regions, leaving escape corridors and stairs fully visible and smoke-free. In small buildings, you will usually find a vent
placed at the top of a staircase, while in larger constructions, corridor or lobby ventilation will be required too. This can be achieved using facade or shaft ventilation. In shafts, dampers are the type of vents used. During a fire, the dampers on the fire floor will open, using the buoyancy of the smoke to lead it outside or up the smoke shaft, whereas, on all other floors, the dampers will remain closed to prevent the smoke from spreading to other areas. Mechanical smoke ventilation Unlike natural systems, mechanical smoke
ventilation systems use fans to achieve their aim. However, vents and dampers will be used to vent the fire floor and also prevent the smoke from reaching other levels. There are two main types of powered system. Pressure Differential Systems (PDS), which can be
20 February 2022
of the pressurisation or depressurisation form — are one type of mechanical smoke ventilation. The former is commonly found in commercial buildings, while the latter is rarely used at all (usually only in basements). Because air will naturally try to move from an area of higher pressure to an area of lower pressure, by increasing the pressure in stairs, escape routes and other protected areas above the pressure in the fire zone, smoke can be contained. This is done using a pressurisation supply fan in pressurisation systems, and a smoke extract fan in depressurisation ventilation. More commonplace is MSVS, or mechanical
smoke extract systems. A mechanical extract pod on the roof helps to draw the smoke, not relying solely on its natural properties. While sucking the smoke out, they allow fresh air into the building, preventing excessive depressurisation that can trap occupants indoors.
Which one’s right for me?
Both systems have their own unique benefits, so picking the right one needs to take into account what you want to achieve and the specifications of your construction. Natural systems are less costly, and require less maintenance. However, they are not the best option for long corridors, and they also rely on favourable weather conditions to be as effective as they can be. Mechanical ventilation is effective regardless of weather conditions, and can be implemented in larger buildings. It also takes up less space, as the necessary shafts are much more compact. If you
legally have a choice, the maintenance and price may make an MSVS system less attractive for a smaller building, though. What should I take into consideration? To choose the correct system, helpful guidance
is provided in Approved Document B. You can also check out the Smoke Control Association guides and BS 9991. For buildings that are relatively lower in height — under 18m— natural ventilation is usually applied. Taller constructions are considered higher risk, and therefore it is recommended that you use mechanical systems for them. The length of corridors is also an important
factor. Longer hallways mean there’s a greater area requiring protection, something that’s not possible to do with a natural system. The definition of an extended corridor depends on building height, the number of staircases and whether or not sprinkler systems are fitted to apartments (in line with BS 9991). The distances are measured from the furthest apartment door to the door to the staircase or protected lobby. But mechanical ventilation can suit smaller
constructions as well. If you’re lacking space, the mechanical option is actually more compact due to the size of the shafts. Shaft-based natural ventilation systems require 1.5m2 (cross-sectional area) shafts, compared to around 0.6m2-1m2 for mechanical smoke shafts. Although these systems may seem pretty
straightforward, and you might already have an idea of which system your building needs, we always recommend getting advice from a professional.
DOWNLOAD THE HVR APP NOW
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
