Comment


The true cost of fi lling equipment:


Why upfront savings can lead to long-term losses & how to choose the right supplier


By, Jack Johnson, national sales manager, ProSys Fill W


hen manufacturers invest in filling equipment, the decision often comes down to price. However, focusing solely on


upfront costs can lead to significant long-term expenses that outweigh the initial cost savings. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is the true measure of value, encompassing factors such as maintenance, downtime, energy efficiency and overall productivity. Understanding TCO and selecting the right supplier can make the difference between a high-performing, cost-effective production line and a costly operational headache.


THE TRUE COST OF OWNERSHIP: UNDERSTANDING HIDDEN EXPENSES Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive calculation that reveals what a piece of equipment will truly cost over its entire lifespan. While low-cost filling machines may seem appealing at first, their hidden expenses can quickly outweigh the initial savings. Frequent repairs and maintenance are common with lower-end machines, which often rely on cheap materials and poorly designed components. These machines tend to break down more frequently, leading to costly servicing, extended downtime and increased


labour expenses. Every minute of unplanned downtime can disrupt production schedules, delay shipments and ultimately reduce revenue.


In addition to maintenance concerns, low- end machines are often energy-inefficient, consuming excessive power and driving up utility bills. These systems typically lack energy-saving features found in premium equipment, resulting in unnecessarily high operational costs over time. Product waste is another significant drawback, inaccurate filling machines risk overfilling, which reduces profitability, or underfilling, which can trigger costly rework, compliance violations, or even product recalls.


Labour costs can also rise with lower-end equipment. Machines that require frequent manual adjustments, recalibrations, or operator intervention slow production and increase the demand for training. Compounding these issues, budget equipment may fail to meet strict regulatory standards in industries like pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and food, putting businesses at risk of legal repercussions, fines and damaged brand reputation. By prioritising TCO over upfront cost, manufacturers can make informed purchasing decisions that contribute to greater profitability,


efficiency and long-term success. Investing in well-built equipment reduces unexpected expenses, streamlines operations and ensures better financial stability in the years to come.


MAKING THE SMART INVESTMENT Investing in filling equipment is a significant financial decision, and cutting corners on upfront costs can lead to major financial losses down the road. By understanding Total Cost of Ownership and choosing a supplier that prioritises quality, reliability and long-term value, manufacturers can ensure they make a smart, future-proof investment.


ProSys Fill designs its filling machines with efficiency, durability and cost-effectiveness in mind.


ProSys Fill machines are designed for:


• Long-Term Durability – Built with corrosion-resistant materials to withstand heavy use and frequent cleaning


• Precision Filling – Reducing waste and ensuring compliance with industry regulations.


• Automation and Efficiency – Advanced technology that minimises downtime and maximises throughput


• Customisation Options – Machines tailored to specific industry needs and production requirements


• Comprehensive Support – Readily available parts, training programs, and nationwide service technicians


By partnering with a supplier that meets these comprehensive needs, manufacturers can confidently invest in filling equipment that not only meets their immediate needs but also delivers long-term cost savings and operational efficiency. When evaluating filling equipment, ask yourself: Will this machine save me money over time, or will it cost me more in maintenance, downtime and inefficiencies? The answer to that question should guide your purchasing decision, because when it comes to filling equipment, the cheapest option is often the most expensive in the long run.


www.convertermag.com


Dec 2025/Jan 2026


31


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38