Power Vertical power delivery boosting efficiency and performance V


ertical power delivery (VPD) helps manage power in data centres by boosting efficiency and reliability and significantly reducing energy loss.


Traditional lateral power delivery methods often lead to considerable power dissipation across the printed circuit board (PCB), increasing energy costs and complicating thermal management. In contrast, VPD shortens the power transmission path by placing voltage regulators directly beneath high-perfor- mance processors. This closer proximity minimises power plane resistance, enhances current density, and dramatically lowers power losses. VPD designs that enable direct underside connections to processors and ASIC power pins further optimise efficiency and performance.


some significant limitations. For instance, the ongoing trend towards lower voltages and higher currents at the chip level means that the final conversion stage must be very close to the load to ensure minimum voltage drop and interference caused by connection inductance, and to cope with the higher load transient requirements of the latest processors. Additionally, placing power electronics near the chips poses thermal management challenges, particularly in already confined spaces.


Upstream power conversion from voltage regulator modules at the processors is completed in stages using a distributed power


arrangement. This approach typically involves utility- connected AC/DC converters, backup systems, and intermediate buses with associated power converters operating at voltages that keep currents at manageable levels. These stages help minimise interconnection sizing and cost, power losses, and voltage drops across the system. Designing an optimal power architecture also involves integrating power converters within the data centre’s cooling infrastructure, as well as taking decisions on possible areas to incorporate galvanic isolation in the power conversion to mitigate safety risks and ground loops. Ultimately, physical space constraints and thermal requirements — dictated by power density and efficiency — play a decisive role in where and how power equipment is deployed.


Identifying an optimal solution for data centre power distribution Encompassing everything from traditional AC grid transformers and switchgear to mechanical busbars and high-frequency DC/ DC converters operating at megahertz (MHz) speeds, power distribution within a data centre spans a broad range of technologies. With so many options available, determining the most effective configuration can be difficult to evaluate and, in some cases, prone to subjective judgements.


Uninterrupted power, intelligently managed R


eliable, scalable power is essential for ensuring data centres avoid downtime and data loss and retain high efficiency and security. The risks of power failure, load imbalances, and inefficient distribution can result in significant consequences, from service outages to overheating and equipment failure. Prefabricated modular systems, such as those developed by Anord Mardix, a Flex company, can eliminate time-consuming and costly modifica- tions to data centre expansion plans. These units integrate essential compo- nents, such as transformers, switchgear, and uninterruptable power supply systems, into a compact, pretested assembly that can be quickly installed to minimise disruptions.


compliance requirements, necessitating additional insulation, galvanic isolation, and certification processes. It also raises the bar on personnel safety, allowing only appropriately qualified engineers and technicians to work on such systems. In contrast, bus voltages at 48 VDC remain a popular choice with the advantage of widespread industry adoption and proven component options offering multiple sources and lower cost due to economies of scale. They are also inherently safe, as they are below the safety extra-low voltage (SELV) limits.


Another key design consideration is whether the intermediate bus voltages should be regulated or unregulated. Unregulated, isolated designs can provide higher efficiency and better power density, but they typically require a careful selection of downstream converters to ensure


compatibility. Some systems adopt hybrid


regulation schemes,


For example, a system architect might be in favour of distributing power at 800 VDC rather than 48 VDC to reduce current levels, minimise power losses and voltage drops, and enable the use of smaller, more cost- effective busbars and cabling. However, this higher voltage introduces stricter


Improving cooling efficiency at the chip level W


hile accelerated compute platforms have introduced power requirements to data centres, the heat they generate has created a massive challenge for cooling solutions. Direct-to-chip cooling transfers heat from processors to liquid-cooled cold plates. This approach in data centres can significantly outperform forced air cooling in heat transport/removal and make board design more flexible, eliminating the need to place processors and heatsinks near an air exit. JetCool, a Flex company, enhances this approach with microjet technology, precisely targeting hotspots to improve cooling efficiency at the chip level.


www.cieonline.co.uk


where the bus voltage is allowed to fluctuate within predefined limits, with active control engaging only beyond these thresholds. This approach maintains high efficiency while offering greater flexibility for downstream power conversion.


Achieving end-to-end power conversion optimisation in data centres


Identifying the optimal solution for grid- to-chip power conversion and distribution requires a holistic approach. Conventional power tree architectures are less suitable for aligning with the needs of next- generation systems, as the boundaries between conversion stages are shifting. For example, DC/DC converters are now closely


References: (1)


integrated electrically and thermally with processors using vertical power delivery (VPD) technologies tailored to match the unique pin- out configurations of individual processors. When components of the power conversion chain are sourced from multiple vendors, the risk of incompatibility increases. Each supplier may promote proprietary technologies that do not align seamlessly with others, complicating efforts to build a fully cohesive system. This underscores the value of working with an experienced and trusted power conversion partner capable of delivering end-to-end integrated solutions — ensuring alignment across components while optimising performance, reducing costs, and delivering long-term support and guidance. Flex offers a wide range of data centre power and cooling products, including DC/ DC regulators and bus converters, and solutions for medium and low voltage AC/DC conversion, power distribution, critical backup power systems, and rack- and chip-level cooling. Flex also provides custom design solutions, including vertical power delivery configurations and simulation tools to model systems prior to implementation. As well, Flex offers comprehensive monitoring and support to ensure ongoing performance and reliability. With demand for data centre capacity continuing to grow at a rapid pace, data centre operators require trusted partners who can deliver not just products but complete, scalable solutions. Flex brings deep expertise across design, product, manufacturing, systems integration, and supply chain management — empowering data centres to scale efficiently and meet evolving performance needs with capacity coming online when required. From established facilities to greenfield deployments, fast, reliable rollout of next- generation power and cooling infrastructure on a global scale is now a critical factor in data centre resilience.


https://flexpowermodules.com/ https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024/executive-summary Components in Electronics June 2025 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56