search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Wireless Technology


be vital in satellite systems, where channel conditions pose greater challenges compared to terrestrial networks, and Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) retransmissions need to be avoided as they will dramatically reduce spectral effi ciency.


Regenerative architectures – planning for the future


One of the major questions facing satellite technology companies and operators is the architectural approach to take. There are two options for this; Regenerative or Transparent. Put most simply, the difference between the two options lies in where the 5G base station functionality is implemented. With transparent, also referred to as ‘bent pipe’, it is on the gateway on the ground, with the satellite acting as relay, whereas with regenerative the satellite is the base station. The business decision-making factors for an operator selecting between architectures are complex and intertwined, involving business use cases and service requirements, acquisition and operational cost-benefi t trade-offs, and deployment timelines and risks. There are advantages to be had with both approaches – but which is the best choice? The transparent architecture places lower


demands on satellite payload processing, and is based on fi nalised standards (3GPP release 17). It is sometimes seen as lower risk, and lower complexity. As the gNodeB is based on the ground, it is accessible for maintenance, but global coverage is limited in remote, austere, and oceanic environments where ground stations cannot be installed. However, a regenerative architecture supports inter satellite links, which removes restrictions on coverage, and improves quality of service through lower latencies and lower bandwidths required for the feeder link. Less dependency on ground- based gateways also means global coverage, lower gateway costs, and the inter-satellite links also offer greater resiliency in the case of outages. Furthermore, by using programmable devices the regenerative solution can be upgradeable via software- defi ned radio (SDR), offering maintenance ease and adaptability to meet changing capacity requirements. At the same time 3GPP Standards are fi nalising with release


of the regenerative approach, which provides a higher-performance, future- proofed architecture for 5G NTN. The 3GPP standardisation brings all of the benefi ts of the powerful cellular ecosystem, and, with it, integration and economies of scale for equipment from multiple vendors.


Conclusion


19 anticipated soon which will support this architecture.


The regenerative 5G satellite payload is more complex than for transparent and requires performant space-qualifi ed devices, resulting in higher cost. However, this increase is estimated to be only around 10 per cent, and in any case the payload accounts for a small fraction of the total costs involved in building and launching a complete satellite. At AccelerComm we are advocates


While the 5G satellite market is still in its infancy, it is clear from the growing momentum that the industry is focused on delivering cellular services using LEO satellites. The area is not without its challenges, many of which stem from the unique conditions involved in operating at such speed and distance. As with the terrestrial cellular market, the key to successfully delivering for mobile operators and equipment vendors alike will be in working with a broad ecosystem of partners to ensure that the best possible performance is designed, tested, built and delivered. For this to happen, the regenerative approach, which is architected for higher performance both today and in the future, is clearly the route to take.


https://www.accelercomm.com/


WE CONNECT TECHNOLOGY +44 (0) 1403 790 661


www.fclane.com


sales@fclane.com


MILITARY CIRCULAR


CONNECTORS COAXIAL


CONNECTORS


DATA CIRCULAR CONNECTORS


POWER CIRCULAR CONNECTORS


D-SUBMINIATURE RACK AND PANEL CONNECTORS


RF AND FIBRE OPTIC CABLE ASSEMBLIES


BACKSHELLS, HEAT SHRINK BOOTS AND PROTECTIVE CAPS


EXTENSIVE STOCK ON-LINE SHOP


TECHNICAL SUPPORT www.cieonline.co.uk Components in Electronics July/August 2024 17


24HR DELIVERY


NO MOQ


NO MOV


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64