search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE Robotics


PARTNERING FOR SUCCESS


When developing robotic solutions, Antonio Herrera, Portescap’s Global Strategic Marketing – Surgical and Industrial Robotics, says partnering with a micro-motion control expert is the key to success


I


n any robot, the precision of its motion control system is vital. Motion control capabilities make a robot’s physical performance possible, and optimisation of size and weight is critical to fit the footprint of many robot types. To turn a motion concept into reality, dedicated engineering expertise can be invaluable. Motion engineering support can help improve performance and reliability, plus a design partnership can optimise commercial viability and reduce time to market. The spread of robotic technology across various sectors continues to advance in line with technological development. Notably, the proliferation of robotics is enhancing efficiency, safety, and productivity in the manufacturing sector. Yet, robots are also enhancing lives in medical settings, such as improving precision in surgery. This diversity in applications means that, dependent on the robot’s purpose, OEMs have an array of considerations to make in design. Central to all robots, whatever the application, is the motion control technology – motors, gears, and feedback devices – that drives the limbs, joints, and end effectors. The ultimate requirements of the robot have significant implications on the design of the motion system.


Not only does motion design require an assessment of the technology that can solve the challenge most efficiently, but it must also satisfy commercial needs for the OEM. This means the motion system must optimally integrate with the overall robot design, while ensuring ease of assembly and regulatory compliance.


Calculating the working points is a primary step for engineers when designing electromechanical solutions. Determining torque, radial, and axial loads are critical factors that the motion system must be


automationmagazine.co.uk


Finding the ideal robotic motion solution is a balance of interrelated considerations


able to achieve. Yet alongside these needs, the kinematic demands of a robot are vital. This includes the motion profile of the device, and how smooth, responsive, and precise this movement should be – all factors that result from the performance of the motion control system. Crucial to the dynamic performance


of a robot is miniaturisation. A compact, lightweight system has low inertia that enables responsiveness, and low mass also optimises efficiency. Moreover, a micro motion system is essential because of demands on the overall design footprint. To suit the characteristics of many robots and the environments in which they operate, these motion systems must fit within limited physical space – and integrate smoothly with other components. Yet in achieving this, the motion system must still meet the required operating points and desired motion profile.


In addition to these needs, reliability is also paramount. Maintenance challenges or failure in an industrial automation setting can mean downtime, but in a medical setting reliability can impact human safety. Miniaturisation of the motion system adds complexity considering the demands of thermal management, and engineers must also take into account component compatibility, working points including overload and continuous operation, along with other potential failure modes. The environment of operation is also significant to reliability, considering heat (or cold), and the potential for ingress, so the motion system’s design must ensure adequate protection.


Only after investing considerable time and effort into research surrounding these aspects, and a concept has been developed, can a design be created to confirm the ease of manufacturing. Yet the progression from the conceptual design of a motion system to one that can be achieved on a manufacturing scale is significant. The need to revise or change technical attributes


and previously selected components, or even materials selection, can introduce roadblocks that add significant time to project development. To reduce the challenge of moving from


prototype to full production, prioritisation of motion system design requirements at the earliest stage is crucial. This ranges from the fundamental level of balancing torque output with thermal management and footprint requirements, to long-term reliability considerations involving choice of motor technology and material selection. What’s more, all these considerations must be compatible with commercial imperatives. This balancing act can be less burdensome with the support of an experienced partner. Moreover, a motion expert can point towards critical factors not previously considered, that could impact the delivery of the project. By relying on motion control experts that offer diverse, application-specific solutions, combined with an understanding of manufacturability methods and awareness of commercial challenges, robot developers can achieve the optimum path for motion development. This can also involve the choice between Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) solutions and customisation. In addition, a significant benefit of working with a dedicated motion expert is the technical support available throughout the entire development process. Taking into account the array of options


in robotic motion development, it is essential to think beyond the parameters of speed and torque. The motion system will directly impact the robot’s performance and long-term reliability.


Portescap www.portescap.com


Automation | October 2025 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40