search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PUMPS, VALVES & ACTUATORS LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE


Adam Fox, director at vibration control specialist Mason UK, outlines how getting the engineering right, when it comes to the design of rubber expansion joints, can limit the risk of failure


allow for thermal expansion. This reduces pipe stress and allows for movement but an often- overlooked benefit is that if correctly designed they can reduce the risk of noise and future failure of pipes through vibration. In addition, if a joint or connector were to fail or burst, the cost in damages could be astronomical. When fluid is pumped through a system it


F


typically happens as a series of pulses rather than a continuous flow. This can have undesirable effects, such as generating noise or vibration elsewhere in the building. Over time, this can cause pipes and joints to fail through fatigue cracking, causing wider damage through flooding or in the worst case, severe injury. Rubber expansion joints are a type of


flexible pipe connector that offer a solution to this problem. The rubber body of the joint provides the necessary movement in all directions, but if designed with a spherical cross-section it can expand and absorb the energy as pulses pass through. The right design greatly reduces the risk of pipe noise or potential failure further down


lexible pipe connectors are normally used to allow movement, due to connection to moving equipment, or to


the line. These connectors are therefore commonly found on the inlet and outlet of pumps, as well as where thermal expansion of pipes occurs. The consequences of flooding could be


severe, so the cost of failure is high. Buildings have been written off and injury can easily result, especially with steam pipes.


Choosing the right material With regard to vibration control, we learn a lot from the technical literature. True expertise, however, comes from combining this with decades of testing applications and research. For example, the introduction of our SAFEFLEX rubber expansion joints in 1996 was the culmination of twenty years of research. A key improvement made by our engineers


was the switch of elastomer from Neoprene to Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM). The latter is superior to Neoprene in minimising water swell and resistance to oxygen, so suits applications involving water pipes. Other benefits include superior ozone ageing and high temperature tolerance. We had assumed, like everyone else, that


Natural Rubber encapsulated between two Neoprene or EPDM layers was safe at higher temperatures. Practice taught us otherwise:


exposure to high temperature over time led to a hardening of the inner carcass. The solution was to produce a tire or body


that was made from the same material throughout. The first key feature of SAFEFLEX was the switch to EPDM throughout. Yet this step, although crucial in our goal of reducing heat failures, was only half the story. We discovered that EPDM’s ability to tolerate


high temperatures was partly dependent on the curing system – the chemicals that stabilise or vulcanise EPDM during curing. Sulphur based curing systems are commonly used because they are cheaper and quicker than the alternatives.


Research and experience Our research and experience demonstrated peroxide was a superior curing agent. It costs more and the production takes longer, but this method truly reduces the risk of heat failures. In SAFEFLEX, the EPDM cover, liner and frictioning materials are all peroxide cured. A further discovery was the effectiveness of


Kevlar. We learned that Polyester (Du Pont Dacron) was much more resistant to higher temperatures, while very close to the Nylon tensile strength. We also realised that Kevlar had a higher elongation modulus, meaning


26 NOVEMBER 2021 | PROCESS & CONTROL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66