search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE OIL & GAS


ECONOMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS IN TANDEM


Stephen B Harrison, Nexant E&CA, explains the need for steam methane reformers (SMR) in the oil and gas industry, and outlines the critical role process control instrumentation plays in gas analysis


S


team methane reformers (SMR) are the most common hydrogen


production technique in the oil and gas industry. Most of the installed base of SMRs is linked to refinery operations, with plans to build more to convert natural gas to hydrogen for gas pipeline grid injection for residential and commercial heating. Hydrogen consumption on refineries has


increased significantly in recent decades to produce clean burning low sulphur fuels and for the hydrogenation of biofuels. In this context, anything that could be done to squeeze a few percent more hydrogen out of an existing SMR has been desirable. For many refiners, SMR optimisation


might be achievable but may represent a distraction from their core focus on processing crude oil and maximising refinery margins. In recognition of the principle that focus adds value, industrial gases producers have developed expertise in SMR operations over many decades and have taken on the operation of ‘captive’ refinery SMRs, converting them to ‘over the fence’ (OTF) or pipeline hydrogen supply schemes. Speaking for Taiyo Nippon Sanso’s US


subsidiary Matheson, Dr. Marco A. Márquez, director of business development – Refining said that: “Through our hydrogen OTF service we often get involved in supporting refiners. Such was the case recently in North America, where we took ownership of a refinery SMR, and converted it to a supply scheme. Using our technical and operational expertise, we resolved some major issues that were affecting the plant capacity and efficiency. After the refit was completed, the plant capacity was increased, and the efficiency was improved. The operating cost savings were significant, being in the order of several millions of USD per year.” Pooling their global expertise offers


advantages for industrial gases hydrogen producers. Márquez again: “To leverage our international scale, our SMRs are digitally connected to our Remote Operations Centre (ROC) in Texas, where we can monitor and operate these SMRs. Our tools allow us to continually observe and control what is happening, and our


26 JUNE 2020 | PROCESS & CONTROL


panel operators can also run specialised simulations to visualise what should be happening. This means they can intervene before minor issues escalate to become major problems. It adds up to better safety, improved reliability and enhanced energy efficiency in addition to maximising hydrogen availability for all our customers.”


Matheson SMR, the LIMA Hydrogen Complex, Ohio


analysis requirements on an SMR are: 1. calculation of the energy value (BTU)


of the incoming feedstock; 2. monitoring methane slip through the


SMR; 3. controlling the steam to carbon ratio


in the SMR; 4. measurement of the final hydrogen


product purity and; 5. measurement of excess oxygen in the


The ABB Uras26 NDIR analyser can simultaneously measure CO and CO2


SMR heater burner exhaust gases. For these diverse requirements, a wide


Whether the panel operators are local to


the SMR or in a remote location, the fundamentals of steam methane reformer (SMR) operational economics are universal: maximise the hydrogen production and minimise hydrocarbon consumption. Production of hydrogen on an SMR consumes methane or other feedstocks in the reaction to produce hydrogen. These hydrocarbons are also used as a fuel to generate the heat that is required to drive the SMR reaction kinetics forwards. Efficient hydrogen production minimises the amount of fuel and feedstock required. In addition to better process economics, this results in environmental benefits with fewer CO2 emissions. So, the process control instrumentation has a critical role to play. Some of the most fundamental gas


range of gas analysers will be required. Steve Gibbons, head of product management for the continuous gas analyser product range within ABB’s Measurement & Analytics business line, said: “A key factor in selecting the right analyser is to decide what the most essential functionality is. Perhaps the priority is continuous and instantaneous measurement of a specified molecule. Or, the critical issue may be simultaneous measurement of a diverse mix of gases, for which a small delay in receiving the signal may be acceptable. For example, the BTU value of the natural gas coming into the SMR is best measured using a rapid response process GC-TCD such as the PGC1000 which is optimised for natural gas BTU analysis.” Direct read NDIR analysers are suited to


Matheson’s SMRs are digitally connected to a Remote Operations Centre (ROC) in Texas, where they can be monitored and operated


the measurement of the final hydrogen purity. Gibbons pointed out that: “It’s generally taken for granted that the gas coming off the SMR will be hydrogen but what really matters is the absence of CO and CO2. These two gases are poisons to the hydro-treating catalysts in the subsequent processes where the hydrogen is used in the refinery. Typically, the final hydrogen product specification will have a maximum total combined CO and CO2 content of 10 parts per million by volume (VPM). Simultaneous measurement of these two components is right in the sweet spot for the Uras26.”


© Matheson Tri-Gas Inc


Nexant Energy & Chemicals Advisory www.nexant.com





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44