PC-FEB24-PG46-47.1_Layout 1 31/01/2024 12:14 Page 46
OBSOLESCENCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO MANAGE OUTDATED EQUIPMENT
Tom Cash, director of industrial parts supplier, Foxmere, explains how manufacturers can manage obsolescence, especially at a time when the UK faces a productivity crisis
he Fincha Sugar Factory, known as one of the largest and most historic sugar factories in Ethiopia, is yet to resume production after ceasing operations six months ago. This is a prime example of the stark consequences faced when equipment breaks down.
T
The factory was closed in June 2023 for maintenance purposes. However, it has since been revealed that the factory is still unable to resume production due to the damage sustained to vital equipment, and the team’s inability to replace obsolete equipment. This catastrophe shows the cruel reality of downtime, along with the impact it can have on workers and the country’s economic stability.
Steering away from Ethiopia for a minute, the UK is currently experiencing a significant downturn in manufacturing production. In fact, a recent report has cited it as the deepest decline since the 2008 financial crisis.
Such decline can be attributed to many things. However, the role industrial equipment plays in productivity should not be overlooked, as according to a survey by Atomik — research on behalf of Shire Leasing — 52 per cent of manufacturing employees said that outdated equipment regularly hindered their work.
This comes as no surprise, as older machinery often lacks advanced automation, which massively slows down production processes, and maintenance becomes more frequent, leading to more downtime for repairs. That’s before mentioning the costly repairs or the equipment no longer meeting current safety and quality standards, which increases the risk of errors and defects.
Quite alarmingly, the limitations and potential consequences of old machinery become exacerbated when factored in with the UK's productivity crisis. But this doesn’t mean that all old equipment must be ripped out and replaced, even if it has become obsolete.
According to the latest figures from the 46 FEBRUARY 2024 | PROCESS & CONTROL
Office for National Statistics, output per hour worked was just 0.6 per cent above its pre- pandemic 2019 average in the first quarter of 2023.
The UK's productivity has not made
significant progress since before the COVID- 19 pandemic. Instead, it has been on a relatively weak growth path since the financial crisis, as productivity progress has not been strong enough to match the historical trend that existed for several decades prior to 2008.
replace obsolete parts as they age, and before they impact productivity
“ The objective is to
to new production methods, including 3D printing and laser cutting, that would otherwise be difficult or impossible for manufacturers to use. Automated machines can also operate around the clock without needing breaks for rest or food, meaning that ‘lights out’ manufacturing can commence. In fact, many employees and leaders already view automation as a
In sectors like manufacturing, low productivity reduces competitiveness, increases production costs, reduces exports, slows economic expansion and potentially cuts jobs.
”
Simply put, the implications ripple through various facets of the economy and can be felt greatly by both businesses and workers alike.
Despite the doom and gloom, there is a way this productivity issue can be tackled — and that’s through automation. In its simplest form, automation helps to streamline production and increase efficiency. Without removing human interaction, robotics can assist workers and increase production output by creating a more efficient environment. Here, they can eliminate repetitive tasks and allow workers to upskill while reducing human error in the process by ensuring higher levels of accuracy.
What’s more, robotics also provide access
complementary tool, with Harvard Business Review reporting that more than 90 per cent of recently surveyed workers said automation increased their productivity. This leads us to our next question: Do manufacturers buy old or new when looking to upgrade their equipment? Well, a study by TAVA Technologies suggests that when a manufacturer’s machine or tool wears out, “the attractiveness of technological advantage, coupled with uncertainty in the marketplace, makes the decision to buy a new manufacturing asset a crucial one.” Although this recommends capital investment in a new machine, it does not consider the more costly factors that can arise.
For instance, the associated lead times for commissioning and integrating advanced technologies into the production line can extend the time-to-payoff, meaning that investing in new equipment does not always ensure the quickest return on investment (ROI).
These problems can be eliminated with
retrofitting — the process of adapting legacy equipment to modern Industry 4.0 standards. In a manufacturing plant, retrofitting may involve upgrading machinery with modern sensors, automation components or control systems to enhance efficiency and functionality without replacing the entire system.
Let’s take a facility that requires several different packaging processes to operate from the same area as an example. Using
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58