search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PC-DEC22-PG09.1_Layout 1 09/01/2023 09:25 Page 9


HAZARDOUS AREAS & SAFETY


DIGITAL WORK PERMITS IMPROVE PROTECTION


use slightly differing approaches. As a result, the central safety co-ordinator may need to spend time interpreting notes before they can get an overview of performance. It's possible to overcome these issues by


putting in place a software-based approach that enables local teams to apply and review permits quickly, providing accurate, consistent and up-to-date reporting to HQ. This digital permit to work makes it


Manufacturers need tighter processes to protect worker safety. Gary Marsden, global product manager for Elecosoft's ShireSystem maintenance and facilities management software, shows how a new digital work permit system can help


fatal and 123 fatal accidents in 2021/22. The issue is particularly acute in manufacturing, where accident rates are higher than average. Workers in manufacturing companies face


A


higher levels of risk in some activities. For example, when working at height or when navigating a workshop with moving machinery and trip hazards. After reviewing and categorising safety


incidents, an in-depth study by the University of Bristol identified the underlying risk factors. It turns out that three of the most common


issues in manufacturing are having weak safety management systems in place, having an operational culture that is not geared up to identify and reduce risk, and a lack of adequate risk assessments. While these are all relatively straightforward,


they need determined effort and focus so that safety remains top of mind at every level from front-line operators and central safety co- ordinators to the board room. This can be challenging for people when they are faced with day-to-day changes and distractions. However, software tools are available to help


maintain focus. Not only does this keep people safe but it improves the quality of safety processes while reducing the administrative burden on front-line teams.


ccording to the latest statistics from the Health & Safety Executive, workers in the UK experienced more than 61,000 non-


Digital permit to work Most manufacturing companies have permit to work procedures established. These ensure that workers or contractors must apply for and receive authorisation from a responsible person before starting work on a high-risk activity where they may be exposed to extreme temperatures, confined spaces, heights, electric shock or other risks. Traditionally, the permit process is managed


locally using email or paper-based systems with permits saved onto a local file server. For medium and large businesses, the local administrator or manager needs to share permits with a central health and safety coordinator who is responsible for tracking and monitoring overall performance across multiple sites. There are several drawbacks with this


approach. While it’s straightforward, it relies on paperwork not getting damaged or going missing. In addition, the process may be disrupted at times when the local administrator is absent. Another potential problem with this


approach is the audit trail and management reporting. This can create issues around compliance. A central safety team may not be able to access records from local teams spread around the country or around the world. Even when local teams do submit records, they may take different formats and


possible to address the three safety issues identified by the University of Bath. In the first instance, it provides a structured framework to ensure the permit to work process is followed consistently, creating a strong safety management system. Second, it creates a common experience across the company to support the safety culture. And third, it avoids local variation to ensure that risk assessments meet requirements. The benefit for maintenance technicians


is that they can access their work permits on their smart phone. Meanwhile, it frees up time for the local administrators. The software will take care of circulating the permits, maintaining records and reporting to management. The benefits for central compliance teams


are that they can identify issues quickly when they arise and take action. In the case of an incident, having a digital audit trail in place means that they can review and report on the types of risks that workers in the business are facing, and how frequently. The new approach is a new feature that


can be found in some Computerised Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) and Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) systems that are used to track preventive and reactive maintenance tasks. Although many businesses may already have such systems in place, some software such as ShireSystem from Elecosoft, is now able to automatically add permits and risk assessments to maintenance tasks. The key to success with any software


solution is that it must match the experience and expectations of people working in the business. Therefore, when looking to deploy a digital permit to work solution, it’s worth checking whether a software supplier can easily adapt its systems to integrate the jargon, language and process that your team uses on the front line. Also, it should be flexible enough to match a company’s workflows and approvals processes. While these may seem like details, they are


important factors in supporting a business’s safety culture and practice.


Elecosoft elecosoft.com


DECEMBER 2022/JANUARY 2023 | PROCESS & CONTROL 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70