search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Calibration K


IT has launched a free Calibration Compliance Scorecard designed to help manufacturers assess audit readiness, reduce non-conformance risk and identify weaknesses in their calibration control before they become audit findings, production disruptions or product safety concerns.


The scorecard gives quality, technical, engineering and operations teams a practical way to assess how close they are to simple, audit-ready calibration control. It covers six core areas: leadership and governance, equipment and asset control, in-house calibration capability, records and traceability, scheduling and preventive control, and continuous improvement. Calibration is often treated as a background task until an auditor asks for evidence or a critical item is found to be overdue. For manufacturers operating under customer, ISO quality or industry safety standards, weak calibration records can quickly create wider issues around traceability, product release, downtime and non-conformance management. The new KIT scorecard is intended to help sites move away from reactive calibration management and towards a more controlled, visible and repeatable process. Users score their current approach across 30 statements, producing an overall rating out of 150 and a risk band ranging from “audit-ready and in control” to “critical risk”. Wayne Stant, head of Marketing Strategy for KIT, says: “Too many manufacturers only discover calibration weaknesses when an auditor asks for proof. By that point, teams are often searching for certificates, checking spreadsheets or trying to explain why equipment has gone overdue. This scorecard gives them a simple way to see the gaps earlier and prioritise the areas that matter most.” “As with KIT, the goal is not to make calibration more complicated. It is to make it calmer, clearer and easier to evidence. If a manufacturer can see what equipment exists, when it is due, who is responsible and where the records are stored, audits become far less stressful.” The scorecard also highlights the growing importance of internal calibration capability. Many manufacturers still rely heavily on external providers, which can create delays, missed dates and uncertainty when records are not connected to the wider equipment history. KIT’s approach supports manufacturers in building a balanced clearer rhythm around internal checks and external calibration tasks, certificates, reminders and compliance evidence. The free Calibration Compliance Scorecard takes less than five minutes to complete and is suitable for manufacturers that want to improve audit readiness, reduce reliance on ad-hoc paperwork and gain better visibility over calibration risk. It can be completed by quality managers, technical managers, engineering teams or site leadership as part of an internal review, audit preparation exercise or improvement planning session. Manufacturers using the scorecard are encouraged to focus first on their lowest scoring areas, particularly where overdue calibrations, missing certificates, unclear


58


NEW SCORECARD HELPS MANUFACTURERS SPOT CALIBRATION COMPLIANCE GAPS BEFORE AUDITORS DO


ownership or weak traceability could affect customer audits, product safety or operational continuity.


AVAILABILITY


The KIT Calibration Compliance Scorecard is available now as a free resource for manufacturers from the KIT website. Anyone who completes the scorecard will also receive a free copy of a report of the top 10 calibration control failures in manufacturing.


KIT thisiskit.com/calibration-compliance September 2026 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72