Test & measurement
I 22
n many sectors, such as the Food, Chemical and Pharmaceutical industries, precision is one of the key requirements in daily production operations. Reliable level measurement plays a decisive role here - whether it is to avoid being overfilled, to ensure material availability for dosing processes or for continuous process control. The selection of suitable measurement technology depends on a variety of influencing factors: from product properties and structural conditions to regulatory requirements in sensitive areas. A central requirement is to reliably and accurately determine the actual content of a container under all conditions - regardless of shape, medium or environment.
TRADITIONAL MEASURING METHODS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS
In practice, various measuring principles are used - from radar and microwave sensors to ultrasonic and capacitive methods through to hydrostatic or optical systems. However, many of these technologies only record an indirect measured value - such as the distance to the surface or the pressure at the bottom of the container - from which the fill level is calculated. This inevitably leads to uncertainties, for example in the case of foam or bridge formation, uneven pouring cones, caking or variable density. Industrial experience, for example at the chemical company Solvay Fluor in Frankfurt, also shows the practical limits of conventional systems. There, non-contact measuring methods led to unsatisfactory results, as changes in temperature and density severely impaired accuracy. The solution was only found by retrofitting the PanCake load cells series by Minebea Intec, a leading global manufacturer of weighing and inspection
PRECISE LEVEL CONTROL:
WITH THE RIGHT TECHNOLOGY
Whether in silos, tanks or process containers - the exact detection of fill levels is crucial for stable, safe and economical production processes. However, many common measuring methods quickly reach their limits in practice. This technical article from Minebea Intec compares established technologies such as radar, ultrasound or capacitive sensors with the gravimetric method - and shows why weighing technology is superior where it really matters.
technologies, which enabled precise and reliable level measurement by weight - with a maximum deviation of just 1.1 per cent, compared to around 2.5 per cent with the previous methods.
GRAVIMETRIC MEASUREMENT: OBJECTIVE, NON-CONTACT, PRECISE Unlike all other methods, gravimetric level measurement does not measure a derived process signal - it measures the mass. Load cells such as the PanCake or Inteco record the weight of the entire container including its contents - regardless of material properties, density changes or form
November 2025 Instrumentation Monthly
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73
