Flow, level & control
Graph 1: Cl2 detection failures below 650mV by ORP methods due to slow reaction times, denoted by areas within red lines.
Graph 2: Back wash of the GAC caused some Cl2 breakthrough.
presence of oxidising substances, including chlorine, which has an identification level around 650mV. The trial would also compare the measurement precision of the cubes; an ORP sensor might be suitable for indication of oxidising species in the media, but they can also be affected by other elements. While ORP detects oxidising species, such as chlorine, it cannot confirm specific chlorine concentrations, crucial to determining chlorine contact hours on the membranes. Veolia was also keen to test the efficacy of Bürkert’s MS02 chlorine sensor. While typical amperometric chlorine sensors have a T90 time of around 120 seconds, the duration that it takes the sensor to measure 90 per cent of the chlorine concentration, Bürkert’s MS02 chlorine sensor has a much faster T90 time, reaching the total in less than 30 seconds. The MS02 achieves this rapid rate thanks to its specially designed single membrane protecting the MEMS sensor. Instead of a membrane pair surrounding an electrolyte pH buffer, which is the typical design, the single membrane means less resistance for the chlorine ions before sensor detection. While most amperometric electrodes also require service and recalibration every three to four months, a more serious challenge is that post-GAC monitoring, the effect of polarisation means that this design cannot be used effectively. When chlorine is not present for prolonged periods, which can be expected following GAC filtration, the electrode surface can accumulate residual ions or film layers, and the sensor can lose its balance. As a result, when chlorine presence reappears, the sensor response is slow or does not respond at all. However, thanks to an integrated electrode-block that provides an ongoing reference point, the MS02 does not suffer from polarisation, even after long periods without chlorine detection.
Graph 3: Graph shows that if ORP was the control, it would result in some Cl2 penetrating through to the RO membranes.
and beverage sectors. At its Customer Experience and Life Science Centre of Excellence engineer training facility near Dublin, the site includes a granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration system, primarily installed to remove chlorine upstream of an RO membrane. The GAC filters are installed to dechlorinate the feed and protect the RO membranes. The vessels are periodically backwashed to remove accumulated particulates and maintain bed hydraulics; continuous chlorine monitoring is required to verify dechlorination performance and detect any chlorine breakthrough, particularly during operational upsets such as backwash and rinse. Veolia reported that customer experience with techniques involving reagents is not a continuous measurement device and requires management of the reagent. The alternative traditional amperometric probes are maintenance intensive due to their inherent potential for drift, resulting
Instrumentation Monthly April 2026
from the manual approach to sample taking and analysis. While the test frequency required to achieve accurate and reliable results demands high costs in both reagent and operator time, a less frequent testing regime, such as testing on an hourly basis, is insufficient to achieve consistent results. In contrast, a continuous online monitoring method delivers consistent readings to achieve precise analysis for effective membrane protection. To compare the effectiveness of technologies for online chlorine monitoring, identifying a precise and reliable system that was also easy to use and manage, Veolia commissioned fluid control specialist Bürkert.
ONLINE WATER ANALYSIS
Bürkert provided Veolia with its Type 8906 Online Water Analysis System, equipped with an MS02 chlorine sensor and MS04 oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) sensor. The latter would provide an additional verification factor by identifying the
RESULTS
The study, which started in October 2024, first compared Bürkert’s MS02 chlorine sensor with the MS04 ORP sensor on the inlet to the GAC system, with higher chlorine levels expected prior to filtration. The chlorine sensor showed significantly faster detection of chlorine, with the ORP sensor failing to initially detect chlorine presence below 650mV for a three-hour period. This scenario repeated itself later in the study when detection was not registered by the ORP sensor over a 20-hour period, where chlorine levels fluctuated between 0 and 300mV. While this represented relatively small quantities of chlorine, over time, it could still generate a volume sufficient to damage the RO membrane.
Monitoring chlorine levels downstream of the GAC system, a back wash caused some chlorine breakthrough, although Veolia was able to send this media to drain, preventing any attack of the RO membranes. Although total capture time difference between the two probe types was much closer compared to the inlet test, the results showed that if an ORP sensor had been used alone, the detection
Continued on page 24... 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72
