search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Predictive maintenance & condition monitoring


Elusive tones M


In this article, Anthony DeSimone, Analog Devices, and Sid Tallur, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, discuss aliasing effects in digital MEMS accelerometers in condition monitoring When using an accelerometer with digital


EMS accelerometers are attractive candidates for vibration-based condition monitoring of industrial


machinery, on account of their low cost, weight, power, and ease of use, as compared to incumbent piezoelectric accelerometers. These features allow equipment manufacturers to embed multiple MEMS accelerometers to detect vibration signals in various parts of the machinery, subsequently diagnose abnormalities and incipient failures by identifying vibration patterns that deviate from normal. While the patterns are unique to different machines and mounting locations for the sensors, the technique broadly relies upon gleaning information from the frequency spectrum of vibrations sensed by the accelerometers, and monitor for shift in frequencies of vibration tones, onset of harmonics, and change in broad-band vibration amplitude, in particular, frequency bands.


output, designers must take into account the bandwidth limitations imposed by the digital filters in the signal chain, and also be wary of aliasing of high frequency signals into the bandwidth of the sensor for a given output data (sampling) rate. For a sampling rate S, a vibration signal at frequency f (where f < S/2) is indistinguishable from a signal at higher frequency S/2 + f, due to folding. In condition monitoring applications, this could lead to misinterpretation of the vibration profile of the machinery. As an example, consider the ADXL355 and


ADXL354, accelerometers that are targeted for high resolution vibration measurement with very low noise to enable the early detection of structural defects via wireless sensor networks. The internal digital filters in the ADXL355 will cause aliasing of out of band frequency, content to frequencies within the bandwidth of the accelerometer. For operation at 4kHz ODR, for example, a


bandwidth of 1kHz frequencies above the Nyquist rate (2kHz) will experience aliasing. This is par ticularly impor tant for frequencies above 3kHz, which will be aliased to frequencies within the bandwidth of the accelerometer (1kHz), thereby causing an erroneous interpretation of the output. A combination of the filter and the sensor resonance results in an attenuation of ~25dB for the 3kHz signal aliased to 1kHz, as seen in Figure 1. The dynamic range of the accelerometer with noise density N = 25μg/√Hz and bandwidth BW = 1kHz, considering R = ±8g measurement range is:


The attenuation for all frequencies between


3kHz and 3.9kHz is less than the dynamic range and thus the aliased signal will be larger than the accelerometer noise floor. For applications where smaller bandwidth is acceptable, the ADXL355 could be used by digitally filtering the output to limit the bandwidth to lower frequencies, such that the attenuation of the aliased signal is higher than the dynamic range required in the application. If the application requires monitoring of vibration tones of amplitude above a cer tain threshold, such that the dynamic range required is 30dB (±8g to ±8mg), the bandwidth can be limited to 750Hz by using a digital filter (for example, four th order Butterwor th filter) at the output. If the attenuation requirement in the application for aliased signals is larger than the actual response in the ADXL355, it is recommended that the ADXL354 be used instead. Since the ADXL354 does not possess any internal digital filters, it does not exhibit aliasing.


Figure 1: ADXL355 output aliasing vs. frequency due to digital filtering


Instrumentation Monthly October 2018 Analog Devices analog.com 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56