search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Flow, level & control Figure 3: Echo plot with Emerson’s Smart Echo Supervision technology.


hazard and endanger personnel but could also cause environmental harm and require a costly clean-up. False echoes can also prematurely stop the filling process, leading to tanks being underfilled. This can disrupt production schedules, result in product shortages, or cause inefficiencies in downstream processes. In addition, false echoes can compromise product quality and reduce process efficiency, for example in batch processes that rely on accurate volume measurements and may yield inconsistent results if level readings are inaccurate.


TRANSMITTER POSITIONING Although tanks with obstructions can present a challenge for non-contacting radar level transmitters, there are measures that can be taken to mitigate the difficulties involved. The first thing to consider should be the position of tank openings. If there is an existing nozzle located with an entirely unobstructed view to the product surface, then it is obviously best practice to position the radar device there. However, it is rarely the case that a nozzle will be ideally situated, which means that other solutions are required.


DEFLECTOR PLATES


In tanks with internal obstructions, some technology vendors will recommend using deflector plates. These plates are typically installed at angles, close to the obstructions, so that they redirect radar waves that would otherwise reflect off these objects back to the transmitter. By angling the plate, unwanted echoes are directed towards tank walls or other areas where they will dissipate instead of reflecting straight back to the radar sensor. Eliminating these echoes enables the transmitter to more easily distinguish the true material level, allowing for a more stable and consistent reading. However, installing deflector plates can be challenging, especially in tanks with limited access or high complexity. Plates positioned incorrectly can cause unwanted reflections or even block part of the radar beam, resulting in signal loss


Instrumentation Monthly June 2025


or creating ‘blind spots’ in the measurement. In addition, if the tank contains sticky, viscous or dusty materials, build-up on the plates can alter the angle of reflection or create false echoes.


FALSE ECHO SUPPRESSION Traditional radar transmitters are equipped with user-initiated routines that can help mitigate these challenges. The user must tell the device which echo is the surface echo. The device will then create a threshold that blocks the false echoes from consideration as valid echoes.


False signal suppression can be effective, but it has limitations. To ensure all false echoes are managed, the tank should be emptied so the device can see them. Having to empty the tank is an inconvenience that can needlessly prolong the commissioning process. Also, we know that the character of echoes from obstructions can change over time. This can happen, for example, with changes in the vapour space of the tank, changes in temperature and also from coating from the process. Because the device creates the threshold based on current echo characteristics, when those echoes change, the threshold setting the device originally created may no longer be sufficient to exclude a false echo from consideration. This could reintroduce an inaccurate level measurement with the associated risks described above and would require having to empty the tank to rerun false signal suppression.


ADVANCED SIGNAL PROCESSING TECHNIQUE


Rosemount non-contacting radar level transmitters from Emerson feature an advanced solution that enables accurate and reliable level measurements in tanks with obstructions, without the complexity of having to install deflector plates or run false echo suppression. Instead, these devices feature a patented intelligent signal processing technique known as Smart Echo Supervision, which dynamically evaluates the behaviour of all viable echoes in real time (figure 3). It then ranks all the echoes according to which behave the most like a material surface echo over time. The echo that most behaves like a reflection from the material surface is then tracked as the genuine surface echo, and all other echoes are automatically suppressed. The technology continually adapts to changes in the echo profile, which can happen as the surface level changes or as tank conditions vary. These features enable Smart Echo Supervision to reduce and often eliminate the need for any type of intervention at all against false echoes. On occasions when false echoes do require intervention, it can be performed quickly and easily through a graphical user interface, simply by right clicking an echo to suppress it (figure 4).


CONCLUSION Figure 4: Smart Echo Supervision reduces and


often eliminates the need for intervention against false echoes. However, when intervention is required, it can be performed quickly and easily


through a graphical user interface, simply by right clicking an echo to suppress it.


Smart Echo Supervision has been specifically designed to overcome the unique challenges posed by obstructions and complex tank configurations. By automatically excluding false echoes, adapting to changing conditions and providing stable performance over time, this comprehensive approach ensures faster device commissioning and reliable level readings that operators can trust, even in the most complex tanks.


Emerson


www.Emerson.com/RosemountNonCon- tactingRadar


33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76