FEATURE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE IN THE DIGITAL WORLD
PLACING DATA AT THE HEART Just as when looking at the far-reaching possibilities of Industry 4.0 as a whole, a digital movement can’t achieve results on its own. Essentially, it must be combined with intelligence – human intelligence. In practice, to render the data harnessed through a network of sensors useful, it must be visualised, evaluated and acted upon. One way of doing this is through
ActiveCockpit, a tool developed by Bosch Rexroth which makes it simple to collect, process and visualise the relevant data of a manufacturing facility. By translating complex data collected from vital machinery via strategically-placed sensors and presenting it in user-friendly visuals in real-time, faster and more accurate decision making can happen on the shop floor. Once installed, this means systems and processes can be adjusted in-line with findings to achieve tangible results, immediately. To make that happen, algorithms and
As Richard Chamberlain of Bosch Rexroth discusses, taking a predictive approach to maintenance is key to maximising uptime, and with Industry 4.0 transforming the manufacturing landscape, now is the time for design engineers to look to digital solutions to reduce machine downtime
F
or manufacturers operating in today’s highly competitive global
marketplace, unforeseen downtime presents a significant challenge, often leading to higher costs, missed order deadlines and even reputational issues. With maintenance-related downtime
having long presented challenges for manufacturers, the process of predictive maintenance is becoming a useful tool in reducing the risk of expensive facility downtime. Based on condition monitoring, essential components are fitted with sensors, each programmed with upper and lower limit values for the sensor signals and alarms based on the operating instructions and experience of past values. In practice, this delivers insights into machine health and enables manufacturers to make better informed decisions around when to replace the
16 APRIL 2019 | FACTORY EQUIPMENT
components of vital machinery – and avoid complete machine failure. With the arrival of Industry 4.0, the
latest technologies are moving this function of equipment maintenance to a truly anticipatory approach. Utilising the data harnessed through strategically- placed sensors, new digital solutions – which can be easily incorporated on the factory floor – generate far more reliable predictions and recommendations based on machine health and knowledge. Interpreting real-time data, the digital solutions facilitate the implementation of anticipatory management measures, ultimately reducing downtime. With that in mind, simply installing the
means through which big data can be collected is not enough; design engineers must combine the power of digital solutions with that of human intelligence.
mathematical models are constantly at play behind the scenes. These are not only written to make the best use of big data, but are combined with huge computing power to enable software to use the data for itself, connecting patterns, pathways and predictions to be visualised for the use of people on the factory floor. Once acted upon, changes can be evaluated to facilitate continuous improvement through machine learning.
PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE IN THE ERA OF INDUSTRY 4.0 So as technology evolves to capitalise on the presence of big data and support manufacturers in their efforts to maintain maximum competitiveness, the primary drivers for manufacturers to implement these Industry 4.0 developments remain the same: to reduce costs, elevate levels of quality and increase output. On the factory floor – where
components are fully networked and connected to give greater control and visibility of their performance – that can translate into a health index programme for predictive maintenance. In essence, that allows components to be replaced at the most optimal time, taking into account factors such as asset health, as well as the impact on the broader connected factory, so a smooth and efficient flow of operations is always maintained. One key advantage of this approach is the accuracy of fault finding and prediction capability. Statistically, in a given case, detecting a fault by chance carries a probability of
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46
