search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
• • • TEST & MEASUREMENT • • •


How to realise power-saving analogue-to-digital conversion for highly accurate measurements


In this article, Thomas Brand, field applications engineer at Analog Devices, presents a low power analogue-to-digital converter (ADC) solution for high precision measurement applications


A


typical application in electrical engineering is the recording of physical quantities by sensors and forwarding of these quantities


to a microcontroller for further processing. ADCs are needed to convert the analogue


sensor output signals into digital signals. In high precision applications, either SAR-ADCs or sigma- delta ADCs are used. With low power applications, every mW that can be saved counts.


Signal conversion with


sigma-delta ADCs Sigma-delta ADCs offer a few advantages over SAR-ADCs. For one, they often have higher resolutions. In addition, they often come integrated with programmable gain amplifiers (PGAs) and general-purpose inputs/outputs (GPIOs). Thus, sigma-delta ADCs are well suited for DC and low frequency high precision signal conditioning and measurement applications. However, due to the high, fixed oversampling rate, a sigma-delta ADC often has a higher power consumption, which translates to a lower lifetime in the case of battery- operated applications. If the input voltage is small – that is, in the


millivolt range – it first has to be amplified so that it can be more easily managed by the ADC. A PGA analogue front end (AFE) is required to connect a small voltage with a 10mV output voltage. For example, to connect small voltages from a bridge circuit to a sigma-delta ADC with a 2.5V input range, the PGA has to have a gain of 250. This, however, leads to additional noise at the ADC input because the noise voltage is also amplified. The effective resolution of a 24-bit sigma-delta ADC is thereby drastically reduced down to 12-bit. However, in some circumstances, there is no


requirement to use all codes in the ADC and at some point, further amplification no longer provides a dynamic range improvement. Another disadvantage of sigma-delta ADCs is the usually higher costs resulting from their internal complexity.


Benefits of combining a


SAR-ADC with an in-amp A similarly accurate but more cost effective and more efficient alternative is to utilise a SAR-ADC in combination with an instrumentation amplifier (in- amp), as shown in Figure 1.


Figure 2. Power loss in the AD4003 as a function of sampling rate


Figure 2 shows the power losses in the AD4003


at various sampling rates as an example. At 1kSPS, the power loss is approximately 10µW; at 1MSPS, it has already risen to 10mW.


Figure 1. A schematic diagram showing a simplified bridge measurement circuit combined with an in-amp and a SAR-ADC


The function of a SAR-ADC can be divided into


two phases: the data acquisition phase and the conversion phase. Basically, in the data acquisition phase, the current consumption is low. Most SAR- ADCs even power down between conversions. So, the conversion phase draws the most current. The power consumption is dependent on the conversion rate and linearly scales with the sample rate. For power-saving applications for slow- response measurements - that is, measurements in which the measured quantities change slowly (for example, temperature measurements) - a low conversion rate should be used to keep the current draw and thus the losses low.


In contrast to such slow measurements,


sigma-delta ADCs have the strengths of oversampling, while using a much higher internal oscillator frequency than the output rate. This allows designers to optimise sampling for higher speeds with worse noise performance or for lower speeds with more filtering, noise shaping (pushing the noise into the frequency band outside the area of measurement interest), and better noise performance. However, that means a lot more power consumption with sigma-delta ADCs compared to SAR-ADCs. The effective resolution and noise-free resolution of many sigma-delta ADCs are mentioned in their data sheets, making it easy to compare the trade-offs.


Conclusion Both sigma-delta ADCs in combination with PGAs and SAR-ADCs with an in-amp are suitable for signal conversion in high precision measurement applications. The solutions both have a similar accuracy. For power-saving or battery-operated measurement applications, however, the combination of the SAR-ADC and the in-amp is better because it offers a lower power consumption and lower costs compared with the solution consisting of the PGA and the sigma-delta ADC. In addition, a PGA with a high gain often limits the performance because the noise is also amplified. This article just covers one possible solution for


a SAR-ADC. There are more integrated solutions available such as a sigma-delta converter like the AD7124-4/AD7124-8 with an integrated PGA.


36 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING • OCTOBER 2022


electricalengineeringmagazine.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44