SAFETY,TRAINING & CERTIFICATION
and not from working somewhere at sea. This distinction is important when contractors work across several asset types. A marine engineer employed on a construction vessel may have a different training profile from an electrical technician who is transported by that vessel but performs most of their work on an offshore installation.
Cross-sector careers create legitimate overlap The boundaries become more complex when experienced personnel move between sectors. Offshore wind and wider energy projects have created opportunities for seafarers, oil and gas technicians, liſting specialists and other workers whose previous competence remains useful but whose new role introduces a different risk profile.
A seafarer moving into offshore oil and gas, for example, may already have survival, firefighting and first-aid competence developed under STCW. That background remains relevant, but work on an offshore installation can introduce additional hazards, emergency arrangements and transport requirements. In this context, the Offshore Petroleum Industry Training Organisation standards, commonly known as OPITO, are used within the offshore energy sector to structure training for specific safety and emergency-response requirements.
One example is the STCW-to-BOSIET conversion route available for eligible personnel entering offshore oil and gas. It demonstrates that recognised maritime competence can sometimes form part of a transition pathway rather than being disregarded when a worker changes sector.
The reverse can also occur. Someone with years of offshore installation experience may join a vessel-based role where STCW maritime training and certification requirements become central. Previous offshore experience still matters, but the employer must establish what the new position requires rather than assuming familiarity with offshore work covers shipboard duties.
Renewables make role mapping more important Offshore renewable projects add another layer because personnel can move repeatedly between marine transport and turbine work. A technician may travel on a crew transfer vessel, step onto a turbine and spend the working period inside the tower or nacelle. Vessel crew and turbine technicians are exposed to some shared hazards but perform different safety-critical functions.
Training planning should therefore begin with the work sequence. Employers need to establish who is operating the vessel, who is travelling as a passenger, who transfers between structures, where each person performs productive work and what they are expected to do during an emergency.
Renewable-energy projects may also use wind-industry training standards, so neither maritime nor offshore oil and gas training should be selected simply because the work takes place at sea. The relevant framework follows the person’s actual duties and exposure.
September Issue 2026
www.dockyard-mag.com 33
This role-based approach also helps avoid unnecessary duplication. Training should close a defined competence requirement rather than accumulate certificates without a clear relationship to the job.
Build mobilisation checks around competence, not course names A useful mobilisation review starts with the person’s assigned duties and then works backwards to training, certification, medical and client requirements. It should also account for flag-state, coastal-state, operator and contractual requirements that apply to the project.
For mixed offshore teams, the key questions are practical. Where will the person work? How will they travel there? Which emergency organisation will they form part of? What safety duties could they be expected to perform? Which existing qualifications remain valid for those duties?
These questions are particularly important when personnel cross between maritime, oil and gas, and renewable-energy projects. Previous training may remain directly relevant, partly transferable or insufficient for the new role. That needs to be established before mobilisation rather than assumed from a person’s job title or sector background.
This process is more reliable than labelling someone “maritime,” “oil and gas” or “renewables” and assigning a standard package. Offshore energy is increasingly interconnected, but its training frameworks still serve specific purposes. Matching those frameworks to the actual role gives employers a clearer competence picture and gives workers preparation that reflects the environment they will really enter.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48
