FSM


Stadium Safety


Hillsborough Law: What it Means for Stadium Safety and Operations


By Lloyd Major, CEO, Halo Solutions.


After decades of campaigning, the Public Office (Accountability) Bill, known as the Hillsborough Law, has been introduced into parliament to enshrine accountability and honesty at the heart of public service. It marks a seismic shift in how organisations are expected to behave before and after major incidents. But what does this actually mean for stadium safety teams? What are the operational implications, and what steps should be taken to help embed a culture of transparency and accountability across the industry?


After decades of campaigning, the Public Office (Accountability) Bill,


known as the


Hillsborough Law, has been introduced into parliament to enshrine accountability


honesty at the heart of


public service.


and It


Lloyd Major, CEO, Halo Solutions


marks a seismic shift in how organisations are expected to behave before and after major incidents.


But what


does this actually mean for stadium safety teams? What are the operational implications, and what steps should be taken to help embed a culture of transparency and accountability across the industry?


20 FSM Any legislation


Embedding Candour And Compliance At The Centre Of Operations that


strengthens public


safety


and


accountability is a positive and necessary step. No family should have to face misinformation or blame in the aftermath of losing a loved one. That’s why the introduction of the Hillsborough Law is being so well received; it reinforces the moral and legal expectation that truth and transparency must underpin all responses to major incidents.


Under this new legislation, stadiums and events


companies across Britain are now reviewing their safety procedures and reporting standards. In industries like aviation, strict safeguards, compliance, governance and legislation have been of huge benefit to public safety. The expectation is that the events sector will see the same benefits by introducing processes to improve and centralise record keeping.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36