FSM
Stadium Safety
Why Flexible Hostile Vehicle Mitigation Is Essential For Football Stadiums And Large Venues
With the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 now in effect, stadiums, venues and public spaces face a legal duty to strengthen safety measures. Hostile vehicle mitigation (HVM) plays a pivotal role in reducing the risk of security threats and keeping people safe. Richard Winstanley from automation specialists, BFT Automation, examines the solutions available and explains why a flexible, tailored approach is more effective than a one-size-fits-all model in addressing evolving threats.
Hostile vehicle mitigation (HVM) has become a vital aspect of safety for football stadiums and large venues, yet relying on rigid, standardised solutions is no longer sufficient for today’s
complex environments. As patterns of vehicle movement and security risks continue to change around stadiums and major event spaces, the introduction of the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 places greater legal responsibility on venue operators, facilities managers and event organisers to proactively address potential threats. Adopting a flexible approach to HVM not only enhances protection against emerging risks, but also ensures that security measures are tailored to suit the unique character and operational needs of each stadium or venue.
Tailored Protection:
Evaluating Security Risks
Certified, crash-tested anti-terror bollards are a practical way to protect buildings from hostile vehicle attack. But there are several factors to consider before deciding what works best – and it can be tricky to know where to start.
The obvious first step is a risk assessment. Every building and venue will have its own layout, access points, and potential vulnerabilities. Understanding your specific risks is key.
Key Considerations For Facilities Managers
The first priority is vehicle access points. These often expose the most vulnerable areas. Security barriers can provide strong protection, but they may also restrict access to car parks. A smarter
alternative is automated bollards, which lower to
allow authorised entry while forcing vehicles to slow down – combining security with convenience.
14 FSM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
