search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Regulatory


The FDA has taken an open-minded approach to what’s permitted, emphasising that commercial devices are acceptable as long as they gather data reliably.


probably just as well and not just for conveners worried about falling out with regulators. As Kehoe says, the rise of DHTs increasingly offers organisers a host of new ways to flex their technical muscles. To give one example, Kehoe brings up exploring why some people end up scratching themselves while sleeping.


Not that digital trials can hope to rely on the FDA alone. For one thing, planners need to think carefully about how to actually employ their devices. Returning to the example of sleep, this intuitively makes sense. While a motion sensor might tell us when someone unconsciously scratches themselves, it can tell doctors little about the underlying causes, for instance whether it’s down to a dermatological condition or something psychological. Goldsack, for her part, comes at these problems from a slightly different angle. One of the great benefits of remote research is that the previously clear lines between clinical trials and regular medicine are becoming blurred. To put it bluntly, why shouldn’t a family doctor exploit the information they gather from a patient’s heart monitor the same way a pharmaceutical researcher would? But with so much information at their fingertips, Goldsack warns experts have to battle to cut through to what really matters – hardly easy when clinicians are scarce and a typical trial leaves upwards of three million data points to parse.


Trial training Fortunately, there is a solution here. By relying on sophisticated algorithms, it’s now relatively easy to divide the analytical wheat from the chaff, even with limited staffing numbers. Goldsack envisages a system that flags the unusual minority of results for


10


doctors to check manually, though adds that “we can’t just shoehorn all these tools into existing workflows”. Kehoe makes a similar point. “Don’t start with the hammer and look for holes,” she says. “Start with the meaningful measure and consider whether a DHT is the best tool to capture that measure.” At the same time, both experts agree on the vital importance of cybersecurity, unsurprising when data can now be fired remotely from a host of different directions. Apart from the obvious dangers – a Philadelphia retailer of clinical trial software was hit by a ransomware attack in 2020 – Kehoe adds that conveners must be equally sure of the ethics of digitalisation, explaining to subjects exactly how and where their data will be used. With so much to consider, it’s no wonder that bodies like DiMe are battling to smooth the path ahead. In Goldsack’s case, one of her most interesting projects involves gathering together “core digital measures” for clinicians to exploit. In practice, that means looking at a range of conditions, then crafting a list of important measures to investigate. The fundamental idea is to ensure that, when scientists research something like sleep, they only keep an eye out for what really matters and avoid being drowned in a flood of useless data points. Crucially, DiMe is doing this work at the pre-competitive stage of the trial process, ensuring that pharma titans develop shared standards before rushing off to market new drugs. That’s echoed, Goldsack adds, by industry-wide training programmes. The point, she says, is to get every department of a pharma company, including unscientific ones, like legal or commercial affairs, to stop being “frightened of technology”. A noble aim – especially when it’s already clear how much devices can offer patients and researchers alike. ●


Clinical Trials Insight / www.worldpharmaceuticals.net


ra2 studio/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53