TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
software adjusts according to the trial design, Coxon says. But some are not designed to processes or integration needs, Kole notes. individual sponsor or protocol and be adjusted if there is a protocol change, she adds.
tag. Minham notes that it is easier to justify the sites or 58,” he adds. But there might be some trial with a larger inventory.
to develop, risking initiation delays. Complex, a simple design, and a system with some degree of customisation can take around four weeks, she adds.
Making time for adjustments as early as possible to have enough time customisable is ideal to maximise the best of both approaches, Wanninayake adds. Due to the time and resource investment Wanninayake says it had worked with some been integrated into their systems. Large pharma aligns with one to three
established team at the vendor to meet their problem than start from scratch.” While open to working with others who might be a without many studies are not aligned to a not an issue, he notes.
32 | Clinical Trial Supply Handbook
The IRT shopping guide prominent role, such as in the decentralised approach of direct-to-patient drug deliveries. For starters, even before a demo or a request for information, companies should review their trial design requirements, which can allow current needs but also those potential needs in the future,” Townsend adds.
technologies to work seamlessly, Townsend systems, Mooney says. The time taken to run adding many people accessing the same report simultaneously can make it even harder. The
Experience counts Moreover, experience is also crucial, Mooney doses with different escalation schedules, and vaccine trials require supply to arrive on schedule, he says. Vendors providing effective customer
support are also vital, Wanninayake says. Typical software company support focuses on how to use a certain function – but within this reflecting the protocol, he explains. With evolving clinical trial designs, these makes it critical to choose the right provider. with additional development reflecting also be flexible to deal with the inherent unpredictability of running a study.
systems should also have the flexibility to meet the unexpected.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56
