search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE AGENDA Geopolitics


Robert Amsterdam


London benefi ts from Russian émigrés – but because of the actions of a small minority they are treated terribly


L


ondon always has been, and hopefully always will be, a truly global capital, drawing talented strivers from all over the world who contribute to our rich social fabric and vibrant economy. But not all transplants are treated the same, and when we look closer at the reasons we fi nd a deeply unfl attering set of circumstances. No one would deny the brutal racism experienced by many foreign-born UK residents from Africa and South Asia, but it is notable how when it comes to the small population of Russian- born residents, there is a particularly nasty set of discriminatory tools and offensive caricatures to be found, and it makes having a Russian surname a liability when it comes to one’s business career. For HNWs, it can even become a threat to their survival. According to the Offi ce for National Statistics, it is estimated that 195,000 residents in the UK hail from Russian-language countries. The true tally could well be higher, but if you were to hazard a guess based only on the level of media attention, one would think they numbered in the millions. From Mark Hollingsworth’s book Londongrad to mentions of ‘Moscow on Thames’ or ‘McMafi a’, or investigative series by the Guardian or Channel 4, we just can’t seem to get enough of what one friend of mine calls London’s addiction to the ‘pornography of oligarchy’. Ever since the attempted murder of former spy Sergei Skripal, these caricatures have mutated into open hatred and suspicion, resulting in collateral damage and state-sponsored victimisation of many innocent Russians in London. At the top of the list of threats is the emergence of unexplained wealth orders (UWOs). The Criminal Finance Act of 2017 allows for seizure of assets and freezing of accounts without any proof of criminal activity. I’ve written on this issue here before, but it bears repeating that this instrument is an example of radical overreach. So far only fi ve UWOs have been made public, but I can tell you from private practice there is a specifi c targeting of Russian residents. Just one of the publicly revealed orders survived legal challenges, while three failed to meet the very low threshold of grounds for crimes. But that comes only after the victim has to go through enormous stress, defamation of character and unnecessary legal fees and expenses because the government happened to not believe in their innocence, often because of their patronymic. Other regulatory tools, such as the Magnitsky Act sanctions, have also become a source of abuse. Though this sanctions regime


The mistreatment and discrimination towards Russians living abroad benefi ts Putin and his regime enormously


was advanced with very good intentions to punish the perpetrators of Sergei Magnitksy’s 2009 murder and deter individual involvement in human rights violations, it is now a wide-ranging and open tool with low barriers for application. It has lately become an open secret that the Kremlin has been successful in using the Magnitsky Act as a weapon against its opponents, leaking selective information to invoke sanctions against enemies. There is a growing sense of frustration and fear among Russian émigrés in London that because of a small number of bad actors, the lot are stigmatised with a Russophobic stereotype. How did this come to pass? Firstly, the reason London has become a beacon for Russia’s best and brightest is that most are trying to plan for a future for their children in a nation that matches their values – values clearly not present in Vladimir Putin’s rotting authoritarian state. The quality of Britain’s education options attracts Russia’s most educated and mobile classes, and as such, there is an over-representation that lands on various wealth lists. This attracts a certain level of envy, scorn and assumptions that they do not belong. Secondly, there is no one to advocate in defence of the rights of Russian émigrés. The mistreatment and discrimination towards Russians living abroad benefi ts Putin and his regime enormously; it helps them keep control of all independent sources of infl uence. Many prominent members of London’s Russian community were themselves victims of corporate raiding, persecution and painful losses at


the hands of the regime. It bolsters the Kremlin’s preferred narrative that the West views Russia with scorn and disrespect and that their only place in this world is to live under the thumb. Lastly, the poor image of Russia in the UK is unfortunately based on factual events. But the poor conduct of the Russian government should not and must not become a measure by which an ordinary Russian-born resident is treated abroad. Let’s take a step back and examine the values which attract émigrés from all over the world to London in the fi rst place. It’s not the weather, and it’s not the affordable housing. It’s because Britain is held up as a fair society governed by the rule of law. Except, right now, that doesn’t seem to be the case for everyone. S Robert Amsterdam is the founding partner of Amsterdam & Partners LLP The podcast Departures with Robert Amsterdam is available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify and elsewhere


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100