Initially, Hayes entered into a Socpa (Serious Organised Crime and Police Act) agreement – a plea deal of sorts – with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), where he stated that he was ‘part of the dishonest scheme, so obviously I was being dishonest’. He then revoked his cooperation, however, feeling ‘unable to admit to things he hadn’t done,’ says Todner. Hayes asserted that rigging Libor had been common practice among the big banks. Todner, who began representing Hayes at his appeal, claims the SFO failed to disclose documents at trial which would have shown Hayes was acting on instructions from senior management. But before she got involved, Hayes had already been sentenced to 14 years in prison. ‘The sentence was monstrous,’ says

Todner. ‘It was much more than anybody else convicted [for manipulating Libor], they all got between two and six years. You don’t get 14 years for a stranger rape in the park.’ The judge, Jeremy Cooke, indicated he wished to ‘send a signal’ to others trading illegally, and in a recent interview with the BBC Hayes acknowledged that he was being made an example of, saying, ‘They wanted to jail a banker… I was that banker.’ Todner managed to reduce Hayes’ sentence to 11 years (of which he served five and a half) and is still representing him today: ‘I believe there are very, very good grounds for his conviction and sentence to be overturned,’ she continues. ‘I think what happened to him is very wrong.’ Hayes’ case revolved around two different depictions of him: the ‘ringmaster’ of a network of corrupt bankers, or the ‘fall guy’ for the scandal, whose colleagues called him ‘Rain Man’ and gave him written instructions to manipulate Libor. ‘If you give someone with autism instructions, they will follow them to the letter. They won’t see the subtleties or the hidden agenda, they’ll just say, “Well, that’s what I’ve got to do,”’ says Todner. As well as issues around endemic malfeasance in banking, Hayes’ case throws up questions about the role that Asperger’s plays in white-collar crime. People with Asperger’s are often highly intelligent with a strong understanding of complex systems and mathematics. However, they can also have difficulty reading social cues and intuiting moral decisions – a combination that can have problematic consequences.

‘Banks actively recruit people with autism because of the skills that they have in relation to maths and logic,’ says Todner. ‘I believe that the banks were very happy to reap the benefits of Tom’s abilities, but then when things went wrong, it was him that they hung out to dry.’ In an interview with Bloomberg, Hayes recalled how he kept being promoted despite being a self-proclaimed ‘nutter’. ‘It’s because I was a moneymaker,’ he said. Gary McKinnon was also a victim of a system which did not understand him, according to Todner, as was another of her clients, British ‘hacktivist’ Lauri Love, who was accused of a spate of cyber attacks on FBI, US Central Bank and

If they ever

thought that they would end up in the high court, the Supreme Court, or the European Court of Human Rights, they would never have done the things they’re accused of

Nasa systems in 2012 and 2013. The two men’s Asperger’s meant that neither of them, she says, grasped the severity of what they were doing. ‘If they ever thought that they would end up in the High Court, the Supreme Court, or the European Court of Human Rights, they would never have done the things they’re accused of.’ McKinnon’s motivation was to look for evidence of UFO cover-ups, while Love ‘just wanted to make a statement about his views’. ‘Sometimes the way people with autism go about it isn’t necessarily the way somebody else would go about it,’ says Todner. Both McKinnon and Love faced extradition orders, which Todner fought successfully

on the grounds of their autism and consequent depression; both were suicidal at the time of their hearings, and she argued that extradition would be a breach of Article Three of the Human Rights Act: the right not to be held inhumanely or subject to torture (the same defence used by Julian Assange in his magistrates court victory). At this point, Todner’s Scottish deerhound barges in, and I take the opportunity to wrestle with my pappardelle (much like ordering spaghetti on a date, I’d caution against eating pappardelle during an interview). Once Lulu has been banished,

conversation turns to a worrying trend in extradition. ‘We have a treaty with the US which David Blunkett brought in 2003, after 9/11,’ explains Todner. ‘The idea was that we would transfer terrorists between the two countries. And actually, what’s happened is that it’s used for just about anybody other than terrorists. It’s used a lot for businessmen, they are the ones that are facing trial over there.’ Mike Lynch is the latest example of a British businessperson trying to resist American extradition. He is facing 14 counts of conspiracy and fraud relating to the 2011 acquisition of his software firm, Autonomy, by Hewlett-Packard, who sued Lynch for allegedly inflating Autonomy’s revenue prior to the sale. Todner, who does not represent Lynch, believes ‘his prospects of defeating the American arrest warrant are quite good’. The UK, it would seem, gets a raw deal when it comes to extradition. An unequal treaty with America means that the US can apply on the flimsiest of pretexts (this includes almost any crime that involves computers, as most of the tech giants are based there). Since Brexit, Germany, Austria and Slovenia have joined France in saying that they will no longer extradite their nationals to the UK, which continues to extradite nationals all over the world. So, what should a British business figure do if faced with the prospect of extradition? ‘It is important to have a bail package ready to go upon arrest – or even better to arrange voluntary surrender to avoid an unwelcome knock at the door early in the morning,’ says Todner. But the most important thing: ‘Make contact with me as early as possible.’ S

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100