search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INSIGHT | RISK & INSURANCE


Risk impact


Schedule delay


Severe cost overruns


Project costs Above, figure 3: Interrelation between risk, schedule and cost SOURCE: RISKCONSULT GMBH


The core principles of the IPD concept can be


summarised as follows: ● Early involvement of all key stakeholders to integrate expertise as early as possible (also referred to as Early Contractor Involvement (ECI))


● Financial transparency through the application of the open-book concept, joint decision-making and development of project objectives.


● Early identification and quantification of risks ● Joint risk management and risk assumption, including remuneration dependent on project success (incentive contract)


● Exchange of knowledge and information through technical tools


● Equal position in the project team and unanimous decision of the core participants


● Mutual, comprehensive exclusion of liability and avoidance of legal proceedings through internal conflict resolution mechanisms


The ideal methodology for the practical application of the IPD concept is the introduction of a Digital Twin (DT). This is a representation of a tangible or intangible object or process from the real to the digital world. DT has become a household word in large infrastructure projects as technological advances in modeling and simulation make it applicable. Elements of a DT include, at the beginning, input and


system integration of data on cost, schedule, risk and budget. In the Project Risk Twin (PRT), the data are linked


to appropriate software. Then, an integrated cost and schedule risk analysis, including uncertainties, is carried out by means of simulation. The analysis results are usually processed and presented in the form of individually tailored dashboards.4


28 | Summer 2023


Based on the core principles of the IPD concept, early


participation of a suitable project insurer would make synergies possible and likely lead to beneficial results. One of the few unique selling propositions of


established, globally active project insurers is the immense wealth of experience resulting from their involvement in countless major international projects. This concerns both the experience with major losses and their causes, as well as the enormous expertise in loss prevention. In the context of risk inspections carried out by


insurers, the sharing of experiences from previous projects, so-called ‘Lessons Learned’, was repeatedly considered particularly valuable by the project engineers, based on the authors’ experience. Especially with the contribution of these experiences


from previous projects, suitable project insurers could make a valuable contribution to hazard analysis and risk assessment in the context of IPD. Large international insurers and reinsurers also have


additional expertise that the other project participants can only contribute to a limited extent or not at all. These include, in particular, highest standards in natural hazard analysis, fire protection expertise, experience in the area of environmental damage and the resulting reputational risk, cyber risk assessment and relevant experience in the ESG area. Early and active involvement of the potential project


insurer would thus have the great advantage of bringing additional valuable expertise to the IPD. Furthermore, the involvement of the insurer in the risk


management concept could lead to the acquisition of more attractive and risk-aligned insurance conditions for the project. These could include, for example, more favorable premium rates, advantageous deductibles or a broader scope of coverage.


Relative frequency


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57