ramp up without restrictions from the HRSG, enabling around 300 MW to be put on the grid within ten minutes of a cold start, the remaining 250 MW coming on line within less than an hour. Combined cycle plants equipped with a diverter damper (DD) provide operators with an extra degree of flexibility allowing them to operate in simple cycle (SC) or combined cycle (CC) mode and respond quickly to fluctuating power market requirements. However, large gas turbines such as F-class machines are required to ramp down their power and soak the HRSG before switching over from SC to CC operation. A conventional switch over involving the ramping down of the GT load and HRSG soak could take approximately an hour (for a cold HRSG start). This is necessary to protect the HRSG from very high temperature transients, to minimise low cycle fatigue in thick-walled components such as the HP superheater headers and the HP drum and to limit expansion differences. Such high temperature transients also increase the risk of magnetite layer cracking in the HP drum inducing growth of cracks in the drum wall. However, with the combination of NEM’s DrumPlusTM
Figure 3. Left: 3D rendering of a DrumPlusTM
drum. Right: Image of the DrumPlusTM
installation at the El Segundo plant. Note that the secondary steam separation bottles are enclosed in one rectangular insulating box
technology and a diverter damper, new possibilities open up for combined cycle power plants, allowing them to switch-over from SC to CC with the gas turbine operating at high loads. This new feature is being implemented by NEM at the Jizzakh combined cycle power plant in Uzbekistan. This employs an F-class gas turbine with a horizontal-gas-flow HRSG equipped with DrumPlusTM diverter damper.
, bypass stack and
SC to CC switch-over at baseload For this project, the client wanted to switch from SC to CC at baseload without GT ramp down. To reduce risks to the HRSG during an SC to CC switch-over, the net heat input into the HRSG can be reduced in two ways: (I) Reduce the GT exhaust temperature at the HRSG inlet, by ramping down the GT to a lower load and soaking the HRSG components until they are heated sufficiently.
(II) Reduce the GT exhaust flow, by controlling the position of the diverter damper.
Option (I) is the ‘conventional’ procedure for a switch-over while option (II) is the ‘fast’ approach. For the conventional switch-over, the net time required to reduce the GT load to the soaking load, soaking the HRSG and ramping the GT back to full load is a bottleneck for the plant operator if the plant is required to increase power output quickly. The option to switch-over without ramping down in load saves both time and money. Hence, we are focussing on the ‘fast’ switchover approach which is enabled by the DrumPlusTM
technology.
There are risks associated with admitting too little exhaust flow and admitting too high exhaust flow to the HRSG. With very low exhaust flow, the exhaust flow distribution will not be uniform leading to poor heat transfer, local hotspots and increased row and bundle expansion differences. Also, start of steam flow is delayed increasing the risk of rows exceeding design temperatures. On the other hand, admitting 100% GT exhaust flow results in higher temperature and pressure transients. Although DrumPlusTM
is designed
to handle temperature transients of the order of 30K/min (and for a conventional drum, the pressure transient is usually restricted to about 5 bar/min), the SH header and main steam lines experience high thermal stress.
The following parameters were investigated to construct an optimised switch-over procedure: (i) SH row and bundle temperature difference and associated expansions; (ii) row temperatures vs
design temperatures; (iii) low cycle fatigue for the drum, SH headers and the main steam line; (iv) bypass valve sizing to limit pressure transients; and (v) total peak stress to assess the risk of magnetite stress cracking.
Taking into consideration the above mentioned factors, an optimised diverter damper operation regime was constructed for the GT cycling window of 40%-100%. The diverter damper is a large door like device and therefore cannot be controlled to precise opening angles. Given the controllability limitations of the DD, the objective of the operation philosophy is to allow a DD opening that admits GT flow that is approximately equal to a certain target flow (about 50% of the maximum GT exhaust flow, ie, the exhaust flow at 100% GT load). The DD operation curve is presented in Figure 4. Figure 5 shows the GT load profile for a conventional and fast (DrumPlusTM
+ DD) switch-
over for an SGT5-4000F type gas turbine. The net savings for the utility operator correspond to the shaded region in Figure 5, which is about 150 MWh. In addition to the time and money savings, the operator also saves on NOx
emissions, which
are higher at part load operation. With this optimised diverter damper curve operation, the HRSG with DrumPlusTM
can
enable an SC to CC switch-over throughout the entire cycling load range without compromising on startup times or the integrity of the HRSG components.
Figure 4. DD flow % and GT exhaust mass flow to the HRSG as a function of the GT load at switch-over from SC to CC
Figure 5. GT load (%) vs time for a conventional and fast (DrumPlusTM turbine
+ DD) switch-over for a typical F class gas
For further details see paper to be presented at ETN Global’s 12th International Gas Turbine Conference, Advancing turbomachinery innovations and strategies for net-zero pathways, Brussels, 14-15 October 2025. Author emails:
gayathri.hariharan@nem-energy.com
sebastiaan.ruijgrok@
nem-energy.com
www.modernpowersystems.com | May 2025 | 23
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49
