News | Headlines
Trump attacks climate research through funding cuts
USA Climate control The USA’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, a research division of the US Department of Energy that focuses on renewable energy sources, said on 6 May that it had laid off 114 employees owing to federal budget cuts, stop work orders and new directives.
Several other climate research groups have also suffered. The administration has ‘released’ scientists working on the National Climate Assessment, effectively cancelling the foundational report that details the effects of climate change on the nation, regions, and local areas.
This follows its budget proposal to eliminate the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration support for weather and climate research, and reports that all the staff working on the US Global Change Research Program, the federal staff responsible for the National Climate Assessment, had been laid off. The measures brought a swift reaction in a statement from Ticora Jones, chief science officer at NRDC (National Resource Defense Council). “Putting the nation’s head in the sand doesn’t make the threats go away – it only makes it harder to prepare for the worsening economic, security, health, and quality of life problems barrelling our way.
“This assessment is so important because it lets every American know how climate change affects their community _ or even their own backyard.
“Cutting federal climate research won’t eliminate the threats from intense heat waves, unprecedented hurricanes, or devastating
flooding, it will just make our nation far less able to prepare for them.”
Budget for fiscal 2026
Donald Trump’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year calls for unprecedented cuts to scientific agencies that, if enacted, would deal a devastating blow to US science, policy specialists say.
The budget document released by the White House on 2 May for the upcoming fiscal year, which starts on 1 October calls for disproportionately large cuts for federal science funding. According to the document, the proposals would cut all non-defence spending by 23%, but it singles out the US National Science Foundation for a 56% funding reduction, and would cut the budget of the US National Institutes of Health by roughly 40%. The Environmental Protection Agency, which on the same day announced plans to dismantle its primary research division, The Office of Research and Development (ORD), would be hit by a 55% cut as the administration seeks to eliminate what it calls ‘radical’ and ‘woke’ climate programmes.
Ultimately it is the US Congress that decides how the federal budget will be spent, not the president. But Trump’s proposal is a starting point for congressional negotiations, and there are signs that many members of Congress will go along with Trump’s recommendations – he has a Republican majority in both houses of Congress.
In a statement, US representative Tom Cole, a Republican from Oklahoma and the chairman of the House Appropriations
Committee, said that the budget “lays the foundation for restoring a government that serves the people – not itself.” However science-policy experts say the budget could be disastrous for the next generation of scientists. “The message that this sends to young scientists is that this country is not a place for you,” says Michael Lubell, a physicist who tracks science policy at the City University of New York in New York City. “If I were starting my career, I would be out of here in a heartbeat.”
Under Trump’s proposals, the 2026 budget of the National Science Foundation (NSF), one of the world’s leading funders of basic research, would drop roughly US$5 billion, a cut of about half compared to its 2024 budget. The budget targets climate science, clean energy, and “woke” social, behavioural, and economic sciences. It would also cut “broadening participation” programmes, which aim to attract members of underrepresented groups to science, by $1.1 billion, a roughly 80% reduction from the last few years. Although the funding for artificial intelligence (AI) research and quantum sciences would be kept at current levels, it is unclear how well the agency itself will function: the budget calls for a $93 million cut to operations, a 20% decrease. Media reports suggest that half of the NSF staff could be terminated. If the cuts go through, Other proposed cuts: The National Institutes of Health would be cut from $48bn to $27bn, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by $9.6 billion roughly a third, and NASA’s budget would drop 24.3% from its 2025 level, to $18.8 billion in 2026.
810 MW wind project halted by US administration USA Wind power
The Trump administration has halted construction of Empire Wind 1, a large wind farm off the coast of New York. Interior secretary Doug Burgum claimed that the Biden administration had ‘rushed through’ the approval of the project ‘without sufficient analysis’.
Equinor acquired a lease of the site from the federal government in 2017, but on 16 April received a notice from the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management ordering the company to halt all activities on the outer continental shelf until the agency ‘completed its review’. The halt work order is a major blow to the US wind industry, which was championed by former president Joe Biden, but has been targeted by president Trump along with other climate change proposals established under the Biden
6 | May 2025 |
www.modernpowersystems.com
administration. Before Trump became president, he campaigned – and ultimately failed – to stop the construction of a wind farm off the coast of his golf course in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. In the days after his return to office, Trump signed a series of executive orders aimed at the industry – including a temporary freeze on federal permits and loans for offshore and onshore wind projects.
“We’re not going to do the wind thing,” Trump said at the time, calling them “big, ugly windmills” that were dangerous to wildlife. He has claimed, without evidence, that marine energy measures were dangerous to whales. He had campaigned on a promise to end the offshore wind industry, arguing it is too expensive, and hurts whales and birds. He issued an executive order suspending new leasing for such projects in federal waters on his first day in office.
New York’s governor, Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, described the halt of Empire Wind 1 as “federal overreach” and said she would fight it “every step of the way”. “This fully federally permitted project has already put shovels in the ground before the president’s executive orders – it’s exactly the type of bipartisan energy solution we should be working on. As governor, I will not allow this federal overreach to stand. I will fight this every step of the way to protect union jobs, affordable energy and New York’s economic future.”
Equinor, the Norwegian company that is leading the Empire Wind project, said in a company statement: “We have decided to stop offshore construction of the project following the order. We will engage with the administration to find out why the order was issued after we had received all the permits previously.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49
