FROM THE EDITOR
COP28 backs global nuclear future
Backing sustained growth in global nuclear capacity, COP28 reflects both changing sentiment and the crushing scale of the climate change challenge.
ith COP28 in full flow as NEI goes to press, the positive sentiment that has been building for nuclear over the last few years has been
resoundingly confirmed. In a landmark ministerial
statement at the conference, more than 20 countries across four continents pledged to triple nuclear generating capacity by 2050. The 28th Session of the Conference Parties (COP28)
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has once again emphasised the urgency of committed action to address carbon emissions. However, this is the first time that the nuclear contribution to that goal has been so explicitly recognised. While it’s possible this was in part a nod to the fact that this year the event was hosted by the United Arab Emirates – a nuclear newcomer in the midst of commissioning the last of the four 1400 MWe nuclear units at its Barakah power plant – in any event, the positive mood towards nuclear is striking. Alongside the new capacity pledge, dozens of nations led by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) backed a second statement confirming that net zero carbon emissions can only be reached by 2050 with “swift, sustained and significant investment in nuclear energy”. The statement notes that since the beginning of the
21st century, nuclear power has already avoided some 30 gigatonnes of greenhouse gas emissions and currently
David Appleyard
provides a quarter of global clean electricity. There’s also acknowledgement of emerging nuclear technologies like small modular reactors and the role they can play in making nuclear easier, cheaper and more flexible. The statement notes this is of particular importance to developing countries, but it is clearly hugely significant to more developed nations too, where the newer technologies are seen as key enablers for increased renewables penetration and decarbonising previously hard to reach energy-intense sectors like transport, chemicals and steel. Alongside new nuclear capacity, the statement also highlights the role of existing nuclear power plants in delivering low carbon energy, saying: “To build a low carbon bridge to the future will require that we keep the operating nuclear power plants serving us today." All these avenues towards a bigger nuclear contribution
are absolutely necessary and the recognition of nuclear in reaching net zero is, of course, a welcome dose of reality that for many has sadly been lacking so far. But the scale of the nuclear ambition also needs a reality check. Although not every nation has committed to the nuclear pledge its worth noting that tripling global capacity means adding well over 800 GW of new nuclear power over the next 25 years or so. Put another way, the current global reactor fleet is comprised of roughly 400 units. Adding another, say, 600 units by 2050 means building an average of one reactor a fortnight over several decades. This sort of scale puts ‘swift, sustained and significant investment in nuclear energy’ into breathtaking context. Certainly, nuclear will be essential if net zero and 1.5oC are to remain even a remote possibility. In the words of the IAEA, ‘net zero needs nuclear power’. To deliver on the scale imagined though means a fundamental rethink of our approach to nuclear energy development. Climate change is an existential threat for humanity and many would argue that for it to be addressed in a timely way requires an all out global commitment. Given the right incentives, humanity certainly can achieve remarkable feats. The Apollo Program of the 1960s is an example of just such an achievement. It’s crystal clear then that a sustainably habitable planet requires a nuclear-enabled net zero world to become a reality. And that means nothing short of a global nuclear Apollo programme will do. ■
www.neimagazine.com | December 2023 | 3
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
