BUILDING A NUCLEAR LANDSCAPE | NUCLEAR POLICY


Left: Progression of another plant at Sizewell in Suffolk is indicative of the UK’s positive attitude to new nuclear


of Great British Nuclear to funding programmes such as the Future Nuclear Enabling Fund to provide support for new nuclear. Despite this, our results suggest the sector must continue to clearly relay the benefits of advanced nuclear technologies. For MPs, there appears to be a growing understanding and momentum for nuclear energy, providing low carbon solutions and substantial economic benefits. MPs are also increasingly recognising the opportunity for the UK to lead the nuclear renaissance in terms of small modular reactor and advanced modular reactor development, providing opportunities to export our expertise internationally.


Addressing concerns around waste legacy This said, whilst nuclear is the only large-scale energy- producing technology that takes full responsibility for its waste, safety, and environmental impact and fully costs this into projects from the outset of development, there remain ongoing concerns associated with nuclear energy. Our research found that for 62% of Labour MPs, the waste


legacy is a primary concern, followed by safety concerns (55%). With Labour anticipated to play a leading role in the next Government, the sector must continue to clearly relay the benefit of advanced nuclear technologies to key figures within the Party prior to a General Election. On the other hand, 47% of Conservative MPs expressed


apprehension about the time it takes to obtain planning permission, highlighting the complexities involved in the regulatory aspects of nuclear projects in the UK. Interestingly, less than 10% of MPs asked were concerned that new nuclear technology had not been used in the UK before, perhaps showing the confidence in the regulatory system.


The length of time it takes to obtain planning permission


for new nuclear projects was shown to be frustrating for MPs. Despite progress in reforming the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project regime, the updated policy statement for nuclear isn’t expected until 2025. This presents a potential hurdle for new nuclear projects, especially given the urgent need to transition to cleaner energy sources. However, amidst these concerns, there is a recognition among MPs of the socio-economic benefits associated with hosting nuclear facilities. The research highlighted that 60% of MPs see jobs and skills as the most significant


benefit to their constituency, surpassing energy security considerations, net zero, and reduced energy prices. The socio-economic benefits associated with nuclear


projects, such as job creation and skills development, present a compelling argument for the continued expansion of the nuclear sector. In a landscape where economic considerations often take precedence, emphasising the positive impact on local communities can help garner further support for nuclear initiatives.


Building stability in support Central to achieving the nuclear ambitions is the need for long-term, consistent government policy. Despite our research showing support across the main two parties, enthusiasm is varied. With an election in the next year, engaging with MPs and candidates becomes imperative to foster greater trust in nuclear technology. The industry must allocate resources to educate and communicate advancements in waste management, assuring policymakers about the responsible handling of nuclear waste. By addressing these concerns head-on, the nuclear sector can strengthen its position as a reliable and sustainable contributor to the UK’s energy mix. The industry must also navigate challenges by engaging


early and regularly with policymakers. Reassuring politicians and reinforcing the benefits of advanced nuclear technologies will be crucial in maintaining momentum. This strategic engagement is essential not only for obtaining planning permission but also for driving policy and political support for low-carbon energy sources. As the UK aims to achieve ambitious targets for


nuclear energy, addressing concerns about waste legacy, emphasising socio-economic benefits, and navigating regulatory challenges becomes imperative. The nuclear sector stands as a viable alternative to fossil fuels. The challenge lies in aligning global efforts with local solutions, balancing economic imperatives with environmental responsibilities, and fostering a collective commitment to a sustainable and secure energy future. As the world grapples with the urgency of climate change, the nuclear sector has the potential to emerge as a key player in mitigating the crisis. The question that lingers is whether the global community can recognise the imperative to act swiftly and decisively in the face of a changing climate. ■


www.neimagazine.com | January 2024 | 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45