COPPED ENOUGH
off would be paid less than the protections currently provide despite giving up an entire day of rest and disrupting their home lives. And for the Federation, this exposed a disturbing truth about the direction of national leadership.
A WORKFORCE ALREADY AT BREAKING POINT To understand the outrage behind Hands Off Our Rest Days, one only needs to look at the state of the service. Chief constables themselves have publicly acknowledged that policing is now sustained by a workforce stretched beyond safe limits. After a year marked by 3,000 protests across the UK, NPCC Chair Gavin Stephens admitted that excessive cancelled leave and constant redeployments have placed enormous pressure on officers, calling the current model “unsustainable”. And yet the NPCC’s official pay submission calls for making rest day cancellation easier and cheaper. This disconnect is not just bewildering, it is dangerous. Officers are already working excessive hours, regularly losing rest days, and shouldering unmanageable demand. Fatigue, trauma and burnout have become routine. The service has record levels of inexperience, with nearly half of officers possessing fewer than five years’ service. Meanwhile, policing has lost more than 100 officers and staff to suicide in just three years. Officers are now leaving the service at the fastest rate in modern times, with many citing unmanageable workloads, fatigue, lack of support and the relentless erosion of personal time. The NPCC proposal doesn’t just fail
to address this crisis, it actively risks worsening it.
REST DAYS ARE NOT A COST-SAVING TOOL Behind the NPCC proposal sits an unspoken assumption: officers will keep absorbing the pressure, keep giving up their own time, keep sacrificing without question. But the Federation’s campaign
“Rest days are not a contingency
resource. They are the foundation of safe, effective frontline policing.”
makes clear that the goodwill of officers has been exploited for too long. A police service cannot run on voluntary
sacrifice indefinitely. Rest days are not a contingency resource. They are the foundation of safe, effective frontline policing. When they are routinely cancelled, degraded or undervalued, officers become exhausted, decision- making deteriorates, sickness rises, families suffer, and more officers walk. This is not just a welfare issue. It is a public safety issue.
DRAWING THE LINE The PFEW’s new micro campaign is the first major mobilisation under Copped Enough, and it aims to do what the service has avoided for years: challenge the culture of constant availability. The Federation will push for:
• No weakening of cancelled rest day protections.
• Better notice periods.
• Clear limits on frequency of rest day cancellations.
07| POLICE | APRIL | 2026
• Recruitment and resourcing that reduces reliance on cancelling time off.
• A national commitment that officers are not a plug gap for underfunding.
• A fundamental recognition that rest is essential, not negotiable.
This campaign is not abstract. It is rooted in the lived experience of thousands of officers who are simply exhausted.
A LINE THAT MUST NOT BE CROSSED The NPCC’s proposals have made one thing clear: policing is at a crossroads. Chiefs can either listen to officers, those who carry the burden, face the danger and
feel the effects of every cancelled rest day or they can continue down a path that devalues, demoralises and drives out the very people who keep the public safe. But if the last few years have shown
anything, it is this: when officers say they’ve copped enough, they mean it. Hands Off Our Rest Days is not just a slogan. It is a warning, a demand and a line in the sand. For the sake of officers, their families and the communities they serve, it is a line that must not be crossed again.
SCAN THE QR CODE AND JOIN THE CAMPAIGN
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
