search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REPORT FROM CHILE


Working Together for Vertical Aviation


By Loreto Moraga R


ECENT REGULATORY ACTIONS in Chile and the United States reflect common challenges facing the verti- cal aviation community worldwide. But


two experiences over the past year involving the Chilean Helicopter Association (ACHHEL) illustrate how international cooperation between industry members can thwart threats to aerial operations. These two cases demonstrate ACHHEL’s


commitment to shaping national and international aeronautical regulations as we promote effective collaboration between vertical aviation stakehold- ers, open new markets, and create regulations that align with current operational needs and limitations.


Patagonia Airspace Restrictions In the first case, ACHHEL earlier this year became aware of a draft management plan for the Kawésqar National Reserve (RNK) that had been under development since 2019. The RNK includes Chilean maritime territory adjacent to Kawésqar National Park, located in the provinces of Última Esperanza and Magallanes, in the Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica Region. This reserve, part of a broader network of protected areas in Patagonia, is crucial for biological and cultural conservation. After reviewing the draft plan, ACHHEL iden-


tified a significant issue concerning aerial opera- tions: the plan eliminated aircraft use for tourism, permitting flights only for scientific, filming, or forestry-related activities. These restrictions applied to all aircraft, including drones.


ACHHEL proposed several key revisions to the


plan. First, we recommended updating the technical definitions for both manned and unmanned aircraft. The imprecise wording of the definitions as they are currently written makes the plan misleading, result- ing in confusion that could lead to problems for the forestry authority and for communities in the future. Second, we suggested shifting the focus from


regulating the types of aerial activities to regulating the types of aircraft permitted in the reserve. This approach prevents contradictions, such as choos- ing aircraft with a bigger environmental footprint to perform conservation work. Regulations, we argued, should focus on the environmental impact of the aircraft, not their activities or missions. Finally, we recommended that aircraft restric-


tions in protected areas be based on measurable criteria, such as emissions and sound levels. Limits on landings, takeoffs (except for unmanned aircraft systems, or UASs), and operations during bird migration should also be included. We will submit these suggestions to the appropriate authorities and local communities.


Advocating for Open Skies A second development in the past year highlights the value of cooperation in the vertical aviation industry, where ACHHEL is active in advocating for regulatory improvements both internationally and domestically. For the past 45 years, Chile has pursued an “Open Skies” policy, deregulating air transport to open international markets and reduce


DEC 2024 POWER UP 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76