search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FIT AND PROPER


MAN REFUSED NORTH AYRSHIRE TAXI LICENCE FOR VIOLENT ASSAULT AND SERIOUS MISCONDUCT


A North Ayrshire man has been denied a taxi licence following a “very serious” series of alcohol- fuelled offences that included stamping on a customer's face and assaulting police officers. Tyler Macauley, a construction worker, saw his application unanimously rejected by the North Ayrshire Licensing Committee on Wednesday, 4 February,


after


Police Scotland argued he was “not a fit and proper person to have a taxi driver’s licence.” The committee heard that during an April 2023 altercation at a Prestwick restaurant, Macauley


engaged in a fight with a 50-year- old man. After the victim fell and struck his head, Macauley “approached the 50-year-old and stamped on his face with his foot.” The violence continued following his arrest, as Macauley resisted officers, used misogynistic slurs, and “repeatedly thrust his buttocks into the groin area of a male officer.” Once at Saltcoats Police office, he urinated on the floor and “spat into the face of a male officer,” eventually requiring a three- person team to move him to a cell. Macauley, who failed to disclose his previous convictions on his


application for the taxi licence, claimed his mother had filled out most of the paperwork and he believed the record was spent. Expressing remorse, he told the committee: “It was not me,” and stated he was “embarrassed and had too much to drink.” He maintained that he has not consumed alcohol since the night of the incident. Despite his apology, the committee remained firm on public safety. Cllr Donald L Reid emphasised the gravity of the case, stating: “These are very serious charges and we have a duty of care to the public.”


CHELTENHAM CRACKDOWN: DISHONEST CABBIES STRIPPED OF LICENCES AFTER SAFETY SWEEPS


Authorities in Cheltenham have sent a clear message to the trade following a series of enforcement operations that have left two drivers without their livelihoods and one facing a massive legal bill. In a joint effort between the police and Cheltenham Borough Council licensing teams, licensed vehicles were pulled over during race meetings to ensure they met safety and regulatory standards. In one significant case, a driver licensed by


the City of


Wolverhampton Council was caught during the November race meet using illegal “ghost plates.” These plates are designed to evade cameras and tracking, and an inspection further revealed the driver was not wearing his required identification badges. A follow-up


58


investigation by licensing officials discovered the driver had also submitted a fraudulent insurance certificate. Consequently, both his driver and vehicle licences were revoked, and he has been added to the NR3 national register of barred drivers as he was no longer considered a “fit and proper person.” At another operation, this time at the 2025 March Festival, driver Mr. Rahman, was stopped for having two bald tyres that fell below the legal safety limit. This discovery


led to the


uncovering of a long history of undeclared speeding fines and false statements made on his licensing applications. Despite Mr. Rahman’s repeated attempts to fight the ban through the legal


system, his final appeal was rejected by the Crown Court on February 9, 2026. The court was scathing in its assessment of the veteran driver, noting that six driving offences over 11 years was an unacceptable record for a professional. The judge stated that Mr. Rahman was “not an honest person” and that there was a clear “pattern of dishonesty in this case.” Supporting the council’s original decision, the court ruled that officials were “perfectly entitled to find that Mr Rahman was not a fit and proper person” and were not persuaded that the revocation was “a wrong decision or anything approaching a wrong decision.” Mr. Rahman has now been ordered to pay £4,180.50 in legal costs to the council.


MARCH 2026 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74