search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALL THINGS LICENSING


be booked and to show that the vehicle is licensed.


The final version of the BPG main- tains that the government believes high levels of signage draw attention to PHVs


leading the public to


This is perhaps an area of considerable deviation between authorities in some areas and unsurprisingly there were many responses to this question, including other measures proposed to assess vehicle suitability, such as emissions levels, safety ratings or mileage.


Overall, most were in agreement that this would significantly benefit vehicle proprietors and the government has set out in the final version of the Guidance that: licensing authorities should not refuse to license a vehicle due it reaching a specified age.


VEHICLE SIGNAGE


Finally, considering the variable and controversial issue of vehicle signage, the Best Practice Guidance sets out that: private hire vehicles should not be permitted to have roof signs to provide greater distinction between PHVs and taxis.


Moving onto the more controversial issues of PHV livery and operator signage, these proposals elucidated different views, with some suggesting increased signage helped distinguish the fact that PHVs were not available for immediate hire, whereas other views expressed that more signage may confuse customers.


Having considered the many responses on this topic, the government view remains that: a distinctive livery requirement would perpetuate the current confusion between taxis and PHVs and complicate the message needed to raise public awareness of the differences between taxis and PHVs.


The issue of operator signage is described as divisive, with little consensus as to what signage should and should not be on PHVs. However there remains a consensus that it is beneficial for the public to be able to better differentiate between taxis, PHVs and those vehicles which are not licensed. The consultation proposals looked to achieve this by limiting vehicle signage on private hire vehicles; with the pre-booked sign acting to inform the public that the vehicle must


PHTM JANUARY 2024 mistake them as a taxi, posing a


potential risk to passengers and PHV driver safety. Therefore, reducing the relative visibility of PHVs in comparison to taxis should help to increase the public’s awareness of the differences between the two elements of the sector, concluding that: limited signage on private hire vehicles will assist this objective and build on the earlier recommendations on roof signs and vehicle livery.


TO CONCLUDE:


Clearly, now the final version of the Guidance is available there are likely to be significant changes for both local authorities and the licensed trade.


However, whist the Guidance is much improved and much welcomed, it does not perhaps offer definitive guidance on some areas which cause such inconsistency between authorities and thus potential tension between regulators and the trade. It also does not tackle some of the more controversial and difficult aspects of the trade, such as out of area working, which will potentially only be addressed by much needed legislative reform.


Nonetheless, the Government has committed to continue to engage with the sector to ensure that the Best Practice Guidance keeps pace with the ever- changing nature of the taxi and private hire vehicle trade, as it adapts to changes in society and technology. As there was a considerable gap between versions of the Guidance in a time where the sector underwent considerable changes, this is to be welcomed.


Yet again, there’s no more important time to be ‘in the know’ about licensing issues affecting the industry and I would encourage members of the trade to join the Institute of Licensing where the guidance is likely to be subject of many events and publications this year.


Full details are available at: www.instituteoflicensing.org


49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80