Security standards
Clare Rogers Senior
Operations Manager – Services, NSI
In today’s security environments
sub-contractors and
labour provision are both commonly used to support
service delivery. Weaknesses in supply chain integrity can risk the safety and security of the public and provide unwelcome opportunities for worker exploitation.
Weak supply chain management manifests itself in the absence of adequate controls regarding: SIA (Security Industry Authority) licensing; security screening to BS 7858; adherence to Working Time Regulations; the paying of minimum wage; identity checks, right to work and employment status. Indeed, lack of oversight is conceivably an opportunity for terror groups to exploit.
Currently, no British Standard covers labour provision in the security sector. To fill this gap, NCP 119, a Code of Practice (for the ‘Provision of Labour in the Security and Events Sector’) and an approval scheme, is now available. This can assure buyers and provide guarding and event management contractors/labour providers with an out-of- the-box tool to demonstrate supply chain integrity. The Code addresses the need for ‘end-to-end’ oversight of supply chains and provides buyers with confidence their main security or events management contractor has secured its labour supply chain.
Jointly adopted by the three SIA Approved Contractor Scheme assessing bodies – NSI, SSAIB and ACM-CCAS – proficient labour provision can now be evidenced with independent third-party certification. When adopted as policy by main contractors it helps drive all labour providers toward good practice. This brings labour provision into line with employed security officers, including screening of individuals in accordance with BS 7858 for individuals working in a secure environment.
Following the 2017 Manchester Arena terror attack, security in places where the public have access has come under heightened scrutiny and underlined the importance of employing professional companies who can ensure all deployed resources are vetted.
NCP 119 has been welcomed by industry with open arms and is expected to be the basis of a new British Standard to be published possibly as early as 2023, compliance with which will signify resilience of contractors’ supply chains that buyers rightly deserve.
© CITY SECURITY MAGAZINE – WINTER 2022
The increasing use of intelligence Joe Connell
Former Chair of the Association of Security Consultants, Board member of the Security Commonwealth Owner, Director of Praemunitus Ltd
One of the most significant
developments in the security sector over the last decade, which will continue to have positive impact over the next ten years, is the increasing use of intelligence. Sometimes described as the ‘second oldest profession’ and once almost exclusively the realm of state security agencies, intelligence management activities are now also firmly embedded in the corporate sector. In fact, a number of private sector organisations have developed high levels of expertise in this area and the mutual migration of personnel between the public and private intelligence sectors is commonplace.
Whilst images of clandestine cloak-and- dagger exploits are alluring, much intelligence is actually gleaned from more mundane methods of harvesting information. ‘Intelligence’ is the overall product of gathering, evaluating, analysing and assessing such information assembled from diverse sources. It is developed and produced specifically to meet client needs. It therefore follows that expertise is required in all these intelligence management skills to be able to interpret, analyse and apply the true meaning of such information in order that it can be put to use to influence operational decisions by the end user. The operational use of intelligence, whether it be knowing your customer, securing supply chains, setting up international operations, managing public events and much more, all requires industry- specific knowledge and risk management expertise.
Increasingly, symbiotic relationships have developed between the state security sector, private security sector and the public at large. The ‘Protect App’ is a good example of Public to Private sector sharing of intelligence products. Developed through an innovative public/private partnership between the National Counterterrorism Security Office (NaCTSO) and Marks & Spencer, it serves as a publicly accessible tool for conveying state- evaluated threat assessments with commercial end users and the public together with useful practical guidance. Sir John Saunders, reporting in Volume 1 of the Manchester Arena Inquiry, emphasised the necessity of paying adequate attention to such shared intelligence products and the need to apply appropriate risk management actions to
www.citysecuritymagazine.com
counter the threat. Indeed, the sharing of intelligence between public and private security sectors is actively encouraged. In his report into the London and Manchester attacks in 2017, David Anderson KC stated that there is ‘a new commitment by MI5 to allow knowledge derived from intelligence to be shared more widely beyond intelligence circles’.
Specialist private sector intelligence organisations have also demonstrated impressive capabilities, for instance Bellingcat in the Salisbury poisoning case. Although it will never be known, or probably publicly acknowledged, how much the state security apparatus had already uncovered, such cases also allow for silent acquiescence of key public safety and security information to be passed without compromising national security assets or methods. Julie Nel, principal of B4Secure, advises, ‘The use of threat intelligence products such as environmental scanning is invaluable for corporates. This analytical forecasting allows executive board members to make decisions based on current and future threats, thereby enabling stability and sustained growth within all sectors of their business.’
Intelligence product alone will not always produce the smoking gun or provide the absolute solution to a problem; as David Anderson KC pointed out, ‘Intelligence is always imperfect’. However, by applying expert intelligence analysis to what the 9/11 US Congressional Inquiry Report termed ‘seemingly disparate pieces of information’, intelligence products do illuminate the scene and provide sound baselines for understanding the threats, for evaluating the risks, for considering the options and for making sound operational decisions.
Intelligence management, both in and between the public and private sectors, will continue to develop and to serve public safety, security and commercial successes throughout the next decade and beyond.
>
8
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
