o a corner


Ukraine defended its capital and government, giving ground in the east and south, trading space for time, and it used that time to defeat Russia’s main effort of capturing Kyiv. Ukraine continued to defend, forcing the Russians to pay a high price in equipment and personnel for every village captured in the south and east.


Ukraine used the time they gained to plan their counter offensives, to train on and deploy new western equipment, including longer- range NATO 155mm artillery and, of course, the infamous HIMARS missile systems. Ukraine knew the Russian weak points, their logistic bases and their command headquarters and put the HIMARS missiles to good use destroying those whilst preparing their counter offensives.


Be under no illusion, Russia has lost every objective it has set itself in the conflict so far, and Putin is quickly trying to change his goalposts for something he can label as success.


In late summer, Ukraine launched an attack towards Kherson in the south, using social media to suggest this was the expected main counter offensive. Russia rushed to reinforce its positions there, the bluff worked, and Ukraine launched its main attacks further north towards Kharkiv, recapturing 3,000 sq km in days, when it took the Russians months to gain the same territory.


The Ukrainian counter offensive has switched back to the Kherson area in the south as troops in the north secure the re- captured ground and wait their next move.


Putin’s response was to deliver the referendum on Kherson, Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia joining Russia, with his pre-decided results, to mobilise 300,000 reservists and increase the economic war on the West by blowing up the NordStream 1 and 2 Gas pipelines. At the same time, he increased his nuclear threat rhetoric, hoping he could hold


what he had till winter, allowing the 300,000 to be trained and equipped and deployed, but to what effect? Ukraine has already defeated Russia’s best units and troops; the reservists are merely more lambs to the slaughter.


He is pinning his hopes on Western support dissolving over a fuel crisis-filled winter in Europe with a nuclear threat hanging over the world. However, China and India have warned him to be careful. They still want Russian gas and oil but also want to keep some relationship with the West.


Underpinning where we are is the fact that Ukraine has the initiative on the ground and is giving the world a masterclass in combined arms operations. It will likely push the Russians much further back before winter sets in, recapturing more territory, further embarrassing Putin and stimulating unrest in Russia.


The issue with winter is three-fold. First, in the run up to winter the ground gets soft, making the use of armoured vehicles off road difficult and therefore favouring defensive operations (the Russians).


Second, the cold and its impact on less reliable military equipment, on personnel and morale, favouring those with the initiative (the Ukrainians); and third, the impact on an increasingly power-sapped Ukrainian people, as he targets power infrastructure. However, Ukrainian preparation and national resolve could triumph.


Putin, increasingly isolated, could then decide to use a tactical nuclear device, (not that any nuclear device is tactical in its effects outside the battlefield). He could try to send a message, ‘Negotiate and accept what I have captured, else the next one is on Kyiv, or Kherson.’ If he did, international condemnation would have to include China and India, for their sakes, and his isolation would be complete.


NATO and the West’s response would probably be conventional and against Russian troops in Ukraine, but once a foot has been placed on the nuclear escalation ladder, it can be climbed very quickly. We are entering the most dangerous phase of Putin’s folly.


However, there is much more for Ukraine to do before that decision point is reached and it is probable we will see the conflict continuing through 2023 and possibly beyond. Putin’s increasingly aggressive rhetoric and economic war against the international community will continue to escalate.


Philip Ingram MBE Greyhare Media


www.greyharemedia.com © CITY SECURITY MAGAZINE – WINTER 2022 www.citysecuritymagazine.com >


20


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36