Social media users well placed to dampen digital wildfires n Older generation need help to stay food secure n Foreign multinationals avoiding tax n Online tool to measure stressful life events n Street children gain a voice n Victory in war needs radical rethink n


NEWS


Frequent clubbers most at risk of stranger violence n Reasons why sex offenders desist n Immigrants quickly think like the British n Public sector ombudsmen need to earn consumer trust n Toolkit balances people and profit n


Deaf find reading a challenge despite improved hearing aids n


NEWS


Social media users well placed to dampen digital wildfires


reports the Digital Wildfire study. The two-year project was led by the University of Oxford in collaboration with the Universities of Cardiff, Warwick and de Montfort. It finds that the rapid growth of social media platforms such as Twitter has been accompanied by ‘digital wildfires’, which involve the viral spread of harmful content such as rumour, hate speech or malicious campaigns. “A wide range of agencies including the police, councils, news agencies, anti-harassment organisations, anti- bullying groups and schools are now attempting to manage the harms caused by rapidly spreading content that is in some way inflammatory, antagonistic or provocative,” says researcher Dr Helena Webb. “Young people are particularly vulnerable to this content, both through what they see and through making posts which they might later regret.” Existing governance mechanisms


U


to deal with social media content are often limited. “Legal sanctions tend to be slow and the police lack capacity to


SER SELF-GOVERNANCE could play a key role in limiting spread of harmful content on social media,


deal with the high volume of problem content online,” says Dr Webb. “Social media platforms mostly rely on user reports after content has already spread and caused harm.”


In view of these limitations, the


Digital Wildfire team concluded that user self-governance could play an


“


to reflect before sharing or forwarding content while also upholding rather than undermining freedom of speech,” says Dr Webb. Social media platforms could, the researchers believe, employ specific features to support communities of people in coming together to halt


Legal sanctions tend to be slow and the


police lack capacity to deal with the high volume of problem content online


important role in limiting the spread of harmful content in real time. This involves actions by users to protect themselves and others. Education, particularly among young people, can foster more personal responsibility, digital maturity and digital resilience. The team’s analysis of social media


content also found that counter speech could be effective in limiting the spread of hate speech. “Examination of racist, sexist and homophobic posts on Twitter suggests that the greater the number of individuals prepared to challenge such posts through counter speech, the more likely this is to quell it. Posting counter speech may encourage others


the spread of harmful content in real time as well as using their terms and conditions to encourage more civil behaviour online.


”


Recognition of shared responsibility by all those involved is needed. “The law is too limited to deal with this problem alone,” she says. “But other opportunities exist to promote responsible behaviour online while upholding freedom of speech.” n


i Contact Dr Helena Webb, University of Oxford


Email helena.webb@cs.ox.ac.uk Telephone 01865 270 551 Web www.digitalwildfire.org ESRC Grant Number ES/L013398/1


WINTER 2018 SOCIETY NOW 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36