BUSINESS NEWS US competition body files antitrust lawsuit against proposed $570m takeover. Ian Taylor reports GBT-CWT merger faces US block
The obstacles in the way of Global Business Travel (GBT) Group’s $570 million takeover of corporate travel rival CWT ramped up last week when the US Department of Justice (DoJ) filed an antitrust lawsuit to block the merger. The case, filed in New York,
argues the proposed transaction would harm competition for business travel management services in the US. The takeover, announced last
March, would combine the world’s largest and third-largest travel management companies (TMCs). It already faced a potential block in the UK where a Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) interim report in November found it “may result in a substantial lessening of competition”. The CMA had been poised to publish a final report on the takeover this month but
Business travel giants denounce CMA’s report
Amex GBT and CWT responded furiously to the CMA’s interim report in November, denouncing it as “an unrepresentative and backward- looking market investigation” and of adopting “an approach that is self-proving and circular”. The companies insisted business
travel “is a highly competitive market” and customers have “numerous options to choose from” and suggested “the market dynamics and competitive conditions described in the report do not reflect reality”. They accused the CMA
of adopting “a fundamentally erroneous market definition” for global multinational customers “that does not exist in reality”,
travelweekly.co.uk
announced a six-week extension of the deadline to March 9 last week. The report in November calculated
GBT and CWT’s “combined share of supply” in the UK to customers “with total travel spend of over $25 million and requirements spanning the globe” at 60%-70% and concluded: “The merged entity would be the clear market leader. “The evidence from the shares
of supply, booking data, the parties’ internal documents, customers and competitors consistently shows that the parties, alongside [rival TMC] BCD, are by far the largest TMCs supplying business travel agency services to global multinational customers, with the merged entity around twice the size of BCD. We found little evidence that any other TMCs compete for global multi- nationals to any meaningful extent.”
based on “unsubstantiated and misinformed views about different customers’ requirements”. In their official response, the
merger partners also accused the authors of the interim report of a “failure to consider properly . . . all the evidence before it, the failure to investigate key issues, as well as misinterpretation of . . . evidence and data submitted by the parties, their customers and competitors”. They argued the report
“describes an artificial business travel market that does not reflect reality and finds competition concerns that are not substantiated” and insisted: “The transaction should be allowed to proceed.”
The report acknowledged “the
ongoing technological innovation in this market” but stated: “We have not seen evidence that technology could substitute a comprehensive business travel agency offering, or that tech- led competitors are likely to become material standalone competitors. “The effect of this merger would
be to combine two significant and close competitors . . . with few meaningful alternatives and significant barriers to entry and expansion.” The report noted: “Both parties’
global multinational customers include companies that play an important role in the UK economy. “Our provisional finding
is that this merger would lead to a significant reduction in competition in the supply of business travel agency services to global multinational customers,
Amex GBT chief executive Paul Abbott announced the deal to take over CWT last March
which would allow the merged entity to raise prices and/or degrade non-price aspects of its competitive offering to customers.” The CMA had confirmed
its referral of the takeover for an “in-depth investigation” last August after GBT gave notice it would not provide the undertakings the CMA sought.
DoJ argues ‘firms will face higher prices, less innovation and choice’
The US Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against Amex GBT’s takeover of CWT places a significant hurdle in the way of the deal, although the inauguration of President Trump on Monday may see changes at the DoJ. The DoJ filing noted Amex GBT
had acquired four other rivals since 2018 and that CWT had sought to win business from GBT, leading the latter to lose several significant bids for business, and that GBT sought to consolidate the market in response. The filing argued: “If Amex
GBT is permitted to acquire CWT, this intense competition would be lost, risking higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices [for businesses].”
Acting assistant attorney general
Doha Mekki of the DoJ’s antitrust division said: “This is the latest in a series of acquisitions by Amex GBT that will further consolidate an already consolidated market. “American businesses
will face higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices.” An Amex GBT spokesperson
rejected the idea that the takeover would harm large customers, claiming it “would bring significant benefits to customers, suppliers and employees”.
23 JANUARY 2025 79
PICTURE: Tom Birtchnell
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88
