search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUSINESS NEWS Thousands of flights


were cancelled on bank holiday Monday last year


Nats slammed for lack of ‘resilience planning’


Interim report on Nats shutdown highlights several failures. Ian Taylor reports


The interim report into the shutdown of the National Air Traffic Services (Nats) IT system last August bank holiday has attributed the scale of the disruption to engineers working from home. The panel commissioned by the


CAA to examine the failure, which led to flight cancellations or delays affecting 700,000 passengers, reported the problem proved “more protracted than it might otherwise have been” due to senior engineers not being available on site over the bank holiday. It also noted a failure “to rehearse” for such an incident. The ‘progress


56 21 MARCH 2024


report’ published last week found it took an engineer 90 minutes to arrive on site, the most senior engineer on duty was not called for more than three hours and Nats waited four hours to call the software supplier for help. The issue arose when Nats’


systems could not process a flight plan for a Los Angeles to Paris service that included identical abbreviations for two ‘waypoints’ on its route – Deauville in France and Devil’s Lake, North Dakota, both designated DVL. Both Nats’ primary and secondary


systems shut down as designed to do to prevent transfer of the ‘corrupt’


data. But the problem flight plan remained in the queue for processing so each time the systems were restarted they shut down again. This cycle only ended “with the assistance of [the] system supplier four hours after the event”. The Airlines UK association


declared the report “damning evidence that Nats’ basic resilience planning and procedures were wholly inadequate”. However, the report also highlights poor treatment of passengers by


Continued on page 54 travelweekly.co.uk


BUSINESSNEWS


PICTURE: Shutterstock/SynthEx


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60