search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Continued from page 56


US should ensure a lengthy trade war between the world’s two biggest economies, with implications for all. The simple formula the


US administration has used to set the tariffs – the size of the US trade deficit in goods with a country, divided by the volume of US imports from that country, divided by two – also makes it hard to carve out concessions. Inflation will rise


everywhere, especially in the US, which may damage Trump’s standing. But his government appears likely to slash taxes and even make payouts to households from tariff revenue. Tax cuts would entrench the tariffs, making them hard to remove without raising tax rates. Commentators have


harked back to the 1930s and the Smoot-Hawley tariffs which exacerbated the Great Depression, leading international trade to spiral, reducing its value by two-thirds between 1929 and 1933. But these tariffs eclipse those. Trade is now three times as


big a share of global GDP as it was in 1929, although US trade, at just over 10%, is a smaller share of world trade than 30 years ago and less than China (12%) and the EU (29%), while services, which comprise 20% of world trade, are not affected. The industry has enjoyed


two remarkably good years post-pandemic and this year has shown every sign of being on a par with 2024, so there is no cause for despair. But a deteriorating economic outlook and UK tax rises in the autumn now seem certain, and a downturn more likely than not.


Luton airport gains go-ahead for new terminal


The government gave a go-ahead to Luton airport expansion last week despite a Planning Inspectorate report that “the adverse environmental impacts would outweigh the economic and consumer benefits”. However, the grounds for


the decision suggest consent for expansion at Gatwick and


Heathrow can’t be guaranteed. Transport secretary Heidi


Alexander granted consent for a new terminal at Luton that will increase capacity from 18 million to 32 million passengers a year. In doing so, she noted the fact that Luton’s proposal “makes best use of its existing runway” rather than “extension of the existing or a new runway” carried “great weight”. Alexander rejected the Planning


Inspectorate’s recommendation against expansion, deciding “the economic and consumer benefits... would outweigh the environmental impacts”. But she said the application


Heidi Alexander


“made challenging demand forecasts” with economic benefits that “may have been overstated”. Gatwick expansion requires


extending an existing runway and Heathrow expansion involves constructing a new one.


EC delays introduction of sustainability directives


Ian Taylor


The European Parliament overwhelmingly agreed to delay the introduction and reduce the impact of EU directives on corporate sustainability last week. This followed significant changes


to requirements under the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) proposed by the European Commission in February. The biggest companies will get


an extra year to prepare for the due diligence reporting rules, while other companies won’t have to report on sustainability for a further two years. The CSRD only came into force


in January, imposing requirements on all EU companies with a turnover of €50 million or more and 250-plus employees, as well as on non-EU companies with significant EU business. But the EC almost


54 10 APRIL 2025


The EC is ‘recalibrating’ sustainability reporting rules


The delays should save affected companies an estimated €6.3 billion in administrative costs. In proposing the changes, the


immediately announced measures to simplify the requirements and reduce the number of companies within scope by about 80% “to boost economic growth” (Travel Weekly, March 27). Under the changes, the CSRD will


apply initially only to companies with 1,000-plus employees and €50 million- plus turnover, and its application will be delayed by two years for those due to report in 2026 and 2027. Similarly, the first wave of


CSDDD reporting – for EU companies with more than 5,000 employees and turnover above €1.5 billion – won’t apply until 2028.


EC noted: “The EU needs to foster a favourable business environment and ensure companies are not stifled by excessive regulatory burdens. That is why the commission is recalibrating some EU rules.” For companies which remain in


scope, with above 1,000 employees and €50 million turnover, the EC will “revise and simplify the existing sustainability reporting standards”, including by “substantially reducing” the number of data points required, “deleting sector-specific standards” and “relieving companies from the obligation to systematically conduct in- depth assessments of adverse impacts”. About 6,000 EU companies


and 900 non-EU companies are estimated to fall within the scope of the CSDDD, as well as “value chain partners including SMEs”.


travelweekly.co.uk


Shutterstock/Algimantas Barzdzius


Laurie Noble Photography


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60